Re: [ClojureScript] Re: [ANN] A post on CLJS DOM manipulation libraries

2013-12-12 Thread Dave Della Costa
Hi Creighton, I've updated the post with a bit expanding on the Enfocus section, including your suggestions. Thanks again for your great feedback-- DD (2013/12/12 23:00), Creighton Kirkendall wrote: > Nice job! > > I noticed a few small things on the Enfocus section that I would tweak but > n

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: [ANN] A post on CLJS DOM manipulation libraries

2013-12-12 Thread Dave Della Costa
Creighton, this is really excellent feedback and exactly what I was hoping for. I am relatively new to Enfocus and had a feeling I could have written that code in a more idiomatic way. I'll edit the piece to incorporate your suggestions ASAP. Many thanks! DD (2013/12/12 23:00), Creighton Kirke

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: [ANN] A post on CLJS DOM manipulation libraries

2013-12-12 Thread Creighton Kirkendall
Nice job! I noticed a few small things on the Enfocus section that I would tweak but nothing that really makes all that big a difference. I listed a few below. You don't need to reference js/document when doing a single selector and you don't need the [] around the selector. (ef/at js/docume

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: [ANN] A post on CLJS DOM manipulation libraries

2013-12-12 Thread Dave Della Costa
Apologies...I messed something up temporarily fixing the issue Luke Morton found. Is it still broken for you? (2013/12/12 22:33), Creighton Kirkendall wrote: > I seem to be getting a 404 on the link now. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojur