Thank you for adding this. I've added some text to my README, so that
the next release will have more information. As I have said, in another
reply, Clojure developers are not my primary audience; this seems like a
reasonable excuse for early versions, but is much less plausible now I
approach a 1
On May 22, 2013, at 04:41, Phillip Lord wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce the release of tawny-owl 0.11.
>
> What is it?
> ==
>
> This package allows users to construct OWL ontologies ...
Not surprisingly, most Clojurists are not familiar with ontologies
in general or OWL ontologies in p
Paul Gearon writes:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Phillip Lord
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's a good question; the library is more intended for people who know
>> ontologies and don't care, or have never heard about, clojure. So the
>> documentation is biased in that way.
>>
>
> This message origina
Ah, now, that is a complicated question with a long history. If I may
duck the question slightly, and just answer about OWL (it's not the only
ontology representation language).
Trivially, of course, the answer is yes. An ontology is representable as
a graph, but then a graph is a rich enough da
Jim writes:
> I am certainly not an ontology guru but I can confirm that what you describe
> is sort of valid...Ontologies will indeed help you find predicate-argument
> structures of the form subject->predicate->object (i.e "John likes pizza"),
> but in order to do that you have to build the doma
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Phillip Lord
wrote:
>
>
> It's a good question; the library is more intended for people who know
> ontologies and don't care, or have never heard about, clojure. So the
> documentation is biased in that way.
>
This message originally confused me. For some reason I
On 22/05/13 15:11, atkaaz wrote:
Would you say that ontologies can be modeled on top of graphs? so in a
way they can be seen as a specific use case for graphs? (maybe
directed acyclic graphs), that's what I am getting the sense of so far
I am certainly not an ontology guru but I can confirm th
Would you say that ontologies can be modeled on top of graphs? so in a way
they can be seen as a specific use case for graphs? (maybe directed acyclic
graphs), that's what I am getting the sense of so far
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:47 PM, atkaaz wrote:
> Thank you very much for this! I find it
Thank you very much for this! I find it very interesting, I shall keep
reading
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Phillip Lord
wrote:
>
>
> It's a good question; the library is more intended for people who know
> ontologies and don't care, or have never heard about, clojure. So the
> documentation
It's a good question; the library is more intended for people who know
ontologies and don't care, or have never heard about, clojure. So the
documentation is biased in that way.
In this setting, an ontology is essentially a set of facts, that you can
test with a computational reasoner; so, it's
I went looking for the same thing. There are a few partial examples in the
docs directory that might be worth looking at.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:06 AM, atkaaz wrote:
> For those who don't know the concepts (aka me) can we get a working
> example of what can be done ? I'm having a strange fee
For those who don't know the concepts (aka me) can we get a working example
of what can be done ? I'm having a strange feeling that ontologies(although
I've never heard the word/idea before except from you) might be something
similar to what I am searching for...
Possibly an example that showcases
I'm pleased to announce the release of tawny-owl 0.11.
What is it?
==
This package allows users to construct OWL ontologies in a fully programmatic
environment, namely Clojure. This means the user can take advantage of
programmatic language to automate and abstract the ontology over the
13 matches
Mail list logo
