Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

Nice! Thank you Devin. Il giorno venerdì 17 maggio 2013 03:12:11 UTC+2, Devin Walters (devn) ha scritto: > > Hey All, > > I put this ( http://getclojure.org ) together and wanted to share it with > all of you. It's a nifty way to search for example usage of clojure. It's > far less curated th

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

This is great, and will make clojure adoption wider. I hope its ranked higher in google results! Also, it would be great if it supports regular expressions like these: "->[a-zA-Z]*", "\*[a-z]\*", etc. as well. I was reading clojure code for a while, and I remembered "->Obj" to be a valid IFn, but

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

This is awesome! I remember you mentioning this project last year at the Madison Clojure Meetup, it's cool to see it in action. This would make a pretty cool test framework for a new Clojure implementation. Timothy On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Devin Walters wrote: > There are some tweaks

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

There are some tweaks required on the analyzer/filter/tokenizer to allow certain queries. I wish Michael Klishin of ClojureWerkz fame was here to take a peek and offer his elasticsearch advice. ;) -- {:∂evin :√valters} On Thursday, May 16, 2013 at 10:39 PM, atkaaz wrote: > nevermind :) it

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

IRC logs from the last 5 years and clojuredocs' DB. The examples were run through a sandbox against 1.5.1. -- {:∂evin :√valters} On Thursday, May 16, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote: > Where is it getting the examples from? > -- > -- > You received this message because you are s

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

nevermind :) it acts the same as ->> even when -\>\> so I don't know what I was talking about :D On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 6:37 AM, atkaaz wrote: > like > http://getclojure.org/search?q=-\%3E\%3E&num=0 > > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Ram

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

like http://getclojure.org/search?q=-\%3E\%3E&num=0 On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Ramesh wrote: > Looks like "->>" is not supported. I quoted it! > > http://getclojure.org/search?q=%22-%3E%22&num=0 > > -ramesh > > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Devin Walters wrote: > >> Hey All, >> >>

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

Looks like "->>" is not supported. I quoted it! http://getclojure.org/search?q=%22-%3E%22&num=0 -ramesh On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Devin Walters wrote: > Hey All, > > I put this ( http://getclojure.org ) together and wanted to share it with > all of you. It's a nifty way to search for

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

Where is it getting the examples from? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsub

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

Really cool. Thanks! On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Devin Walters wrote: > Thanks for trying it out! > > One hint to people trying it out would be to not put too much stock into > the first page of results. The plan is to add user ratings to augment > search results in a meaningful way. At th

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

Thanks for trying it out! One hint to people trying it out would be to not put too much stock into the first page of results. The plan is to add user ratings to augment search results in a meaningful way. At the moment searching for "comp" will give you the most "relevant" examples like: (comp

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

This project is actually very useful for learning clojure one (or two!) function at a time. Thanks a lot! -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new memb

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

Not difficult, feel free to submit an issue on the repo. Thanks, -- {:∂evin :√valters} On Thursday, May 16, 2013 at 8:32 PM, atkaaz wrote: > Ok fair enough. I was wondering however how hard would it be to add a button > maybe? or a var to the url? (or a button which adds the var to the url

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

Ok fair enough. I was wondering however how hard would it be to add a button maybe? or a var to the url? (or a button which adds the var to the url - not sure how these are called) which would switch between the default(as it is now) and the pretty printed output (for all the results not just one o

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

At the moment, yes. The docstrings are not pretty, but in the end I decided that seeing the literal \n was better than pretty printing captured output. That being said, I'm not strongly opposed to changing it (patches welcome), but right now I think not pretty printing output is good in the 80

Re: [ANN] getclojure.org

Hi! http://getclojure.org/search?q=fixture&num=0 is it supposed to show the \n inline? it's a bit uncomfy to have to read those on one line On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Devin Walters wrote: > Hey All, > > I put this ( http://getclojure.org ) together and wanted to share it with > all of yo

[ANN] getclojure.org

Hey All, I put this ( http://getclojure.org ) together and wanted to share it with all of you. It's a nifty way to search for example usage of clojure. It's far less curated than ClojureDocs, so you may pick up some interesting ideas by simply browsing. It supports boolean queries like: "com