Re: [ANN] better-cond 1.0.1

2016-07-02 Thread Peter Taoussanis
Really, really like this. Thank you Mark! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubs

Re: [ANN] better-cond 1.0.1

2016-07-01 Thread Mark Engelberg
Thanks for the pointer to your library, Jason. I hadn't known about it. In response to the interest and questions I've been getting about better-cond, I've added a Rationale section to the README, and I've mentioned your library in that section: https://github.com/Engelberg/better-cond#rationale

Re: [ANN] better-cond 1.0.1

2016-07-01 Thread Jason Felice
You've got me thinking whether there's a more general thing which could be done for packthread: (https://github.com/maitria/packthread). Hrmm... On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Mark Engelberg wrote: > I should add that Dunaj already has this feature, so if you are a user of > Dunaj you do not n

Re: [ANN] better-cond 1.0.1

2016-07-01 Thread Mark Engelberg
I should add that Dunaj already has this feature, so if you are a user of Dunaj you do not need this library. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new member

[ANN] better-cond 1.0.1

2016-07-01 Thread Mark Engelberg
Years ago, Christophe Grand wrote a blog post about how to achieve flatter, clearer, less-nested code by using a special version of Clojure's cond that supported :let clauses (just like Clojure's for comprehensions), as well as :when-let. I've been using that code on a daily basis ever since, copy