Really, really like this. Thank you Mark!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubs
Thanks for the pointer to your library, Jason. I hadn't known about it.
In response to the interest and questions I've been getting about
better-cond, I've added a Rationale section to the README, and I've
mentioned your library in that section:
https://github.com/Engelberg/better-cond#rationale
You've got me thinking whether there's a more general thing which could be
done for packthread: (https://github.com/maitria/packthread).
Hrmm...
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Mark Engelberg
wrote:
> I should add that Dunaj already has this feature, so if you are a user of
> Dunaj you do not n
I should add that Dunaj already has this feature, so if you are a user of
Dunaj you do not need this library.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new member
Years ago, Christophe Grand wrote a blog post about how to achieve flatter,
clearer, less-nested code by using a special version of Clojure's cond that
supported :let clauses (just like Clojure's for comprehensions), as well as
:when-let.
I've been using that code on a daily basis ever since, copy