On 26 May 2015 at 03:54:35, Daniel Szmulewicz (daniel.szmulew...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> Yes, sir. Well understood.
>
> On top of that, the announcement was mistaken. System's version
> is at 0.1.8, not 0.0.8.
>
> Will do better next time.
Thank you! This sounds like a project that can grow in
Yes, sir. Well understood.
On top of that, the announcement was mistaken. System's version is at
0.1.8, not 0.0.8.
Will do better next time.
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 3:49:05 AM UTC+3, Michael Klishin wrote:
>
> On 26 May 2015 at 03:45:04, Daniel Szmulewicz (daniel.s...@gmail.com
> ) wrot
On 26 May 2015 at 03:45:04, Daniel Szmulewicz (daniel.szmulew...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> Is there a consensus as to what versioning scheme works best?
> Or is there no such beast?
> Peter Taoussanis has expressed some reservations regarding
> SemVer and is proposing a variation on it, which he ca
Thank you pointing this out.
Is there a consensus as to what versioning scheme works best? Or is there
no such beast?
Peter Taoussanis has expressed some reservations regarding SemVer and is
proposing a variation on it, which he calls BreakVer.
https://github.com/ptaoussanis/encore/blob/master
On 24 May 2015 at 03:59:52, Daniel Szmulewicz (daniel.szmulew...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> System 0.0.8 has just been released, but it is not the same anymore.
Then perhaps it deserves at least a minor version bump.
Non-standard, confusing version numbers is already a significant enough problem
in
Hello everybody,
System started its life as a component library, a high-level convenience
library on top of Stuart Sierra's components, providing community-backed,
ready-made components: http-kit, datomic, monger and the usual suspects.
System 0.0.8 has just been released, but it is not the s
