I see. Thanks a lot!
2014-03-22 23:32 GMT+01:00 Sean Corfield :
> On Mar 22, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Jakub Holy wrote:
>
> Yes, I am using vinyasa - see
> https://github.com/jakubholynet/dotfiles/blob/master/.lein/profiles.clj
>
>
> See https://github.com/zcaudate/vinyasa/issues/3
>
> Still, Lein's
On Mar 22, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Jakub Holy wrote:
> Yes, I am using vinyasa - see
> https://github.com/jakubholynet/dotfiles/blob/master/.lein/profiles.clj
See https://github.com/zcaudate/vinyasa/issues/3
> Still, Lein's core.cache is nearly the newest available...
My understanding is that 0.6.3
Yes, I am using vinyasa - see
https://github.com/jakubholynet/dotfiles/blob/master/.lein/profiles.clj
Still, Lein's core.cache is nearly the newest available...
2014-03-22 23:01 GMT+01:00 Sean Corfield :
> Ah, I ran into this as well recently with a plugin that was evaluating in
> Leiningen - a
Ah, I ran into this as well recently with a plugin that was evaluating in
Leiningen - and thus Leiningen's dependency on Stencil (and core.cache)
overrode my own.
Are you using Vinyasa or something like that?
Sean
On Mar 22, 2014, at 2:55 PM, Jakub Holy wrote:
> Thank you, I have tried that b
Thank you, I have tried that but haven't found out anything. There is only
one part of the tree that mentions core cache, no conflict (perhaps b/c
there is none until eastwood enters the scene):
[leiningen "2.3.4"]
[stencil "0.3.2"]
[org.clojure/core.cache "0.6.2"]
which is only 0.0.1 ver
Use: lein deps :tree
That should show you where the conflict is coming from (you're picking up an
old core.cache from somewhere).
Sean
On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Jakub Holy wrote:
> For me, Eastwood fails mysteriously:
>
> $ lein eastwood
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeExcept
For me, Eastwood fails mysteriously:
$ lein eastwood
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: No such var:
clojure.core.cache/through, compiling:(clojure/core/memoize.clj:52:3)
at clojure.lang.Compiler.analyze(Compiler.java:6380)
...
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: No
On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> Sean, which version of Eastwood are you using when you see those warnings
> about record? Eastwood output has a line like this near the beginning of its
> output that should verify:
Ugh! I updated project.clj to use Eastwood 0.1.1 but still
Sean, which version of Eastwood are you using when you see those warnings
about record? Eastwood output has a line like this near the beginning of
its output that should verify:
== Eastwood 0.1.1 Clojure 1.6.0-master-SNAPSHOT JVM 1.7.0_51
Does your project depend on the clojure.tools.analyze
Are you sure it's pulling the last tools.analyzer version?
That warning has been disabled by this commit in tools.analyzer
https://github.com/clojure/tools.analyzer/commit/89d98b688448fe3d02bcabea240bcb2f6d2bbd70
which is two months old
Nicola
Sean Corfield writes:
> Thanx for Eastwood - it's a
Thanx for Eastwood - it's a great tool!
Just FYI, using Clojure 1.6.0 builds produces these warnings:
WARNING: record? already refers to: #'clojure.core/record? in namespace:
clojure.tools.analyzer.utils, being replaced by:
#'clojure.tools.analyzer.utils/record?
WARNING: record? already refers
Eastwood is a Clojure lint tool. It analyzes Clojure source code in
Leiningen projects, reporting things that may be errors.
Installation instructions are in the documentation here:
https://github.com/jonase/eastwood/#installation--quick-usage
The previous release was in January 2014. Upda
12 matches
Mail list logo
