tember 7, 2017 5:56 PM
To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha20
Likewise. I expect we’ll put this in production early next week.
Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
"If you're not annoying somebod
I see this too with [org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-alpha20"] and
clojurescript, leading to errors in test.js.
I had to revert to [org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-alpha19"].
On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 2:54:47 AM UTC+3, Jeaye wrote:
>
> Similar to Tommi, I'm also seeing issues with the new syntax wh
Similar to Tommi, I'm also seeing issues with the new syntax when combined with
JS on our front-end:
[org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-alpha20"]
[org.clojure/clojurescript "1.9.908"]
> SEVERE: my-project/client/target/android/cljs/core.js:3579: ERROR - Parse
> error. primary expression expected
> cas
It's a judgement call when to add a new reader type vs when to use a tagged
literal. Using the new reader type allows for greater concision for sure
(##Inf vs ##double Inf) which seems particularly useful with numbers. It
should allow for faster reading, printing, etc.
On Friday, September 8,
Relatedly, what is the rationale for this requiring or benefiting from new
syntax, versus using tagged literals for things like Inf & -Inf. Is it a
compiler performance optimization or something like that?
On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 12:27:02 PM UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 8
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Joel Holdbrooks
wrote:
> Are there any plans to make the ## reader macro extensible in the future?
No. For most data uses you are better served by tagged literals.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To
Are there any plans to make the ## reader macro extensible in the future?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Bill Robertson
wrote:
> Does it run in Java 9?
>
Excellent question! The short and possibly misleading answer is yes, as do
all other 1.9 alphas, and 1.8, and probably earlier versions of Clojure as
well *with some important caveats*:
* CLJ-2077 - clojure.core c
That looks like a cljs issue, it shouldn't emit NaNs at all there, not
relevant to the clojure change around how they are printed.
On 8 Sep 2017 8:03 a.m., "Tommi Reiman" wrote:
Hi.
The combo:
[org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-alpha20"]
[org.clojure/clojurescript "1.9.660"]
seems to be emitting bro
Hi.
The combo:
[org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-alpha20"]
[org.clojure/clojurescript "1.9.660"]
seems to be emitting broken js:
return new cljs.core.PersistentVector(null, 2, 5,
cljs.core.PersistentVector.EMPTY_NODE, [##NaN,##NaN], null);
With 1.9.0-alpha19 it gives:
return new cljs.core.Persiste
I like this one, lots of good stuff. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
On Thursday, 7 September 2017 14:48:51 UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> Clojure 1.9.0-alpha20 is now available.
>
> Try it via
>
> - Download:
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.9.0-alpha20
> - Leiningen: [o
*sees*, not speeds (clearly I'm tired)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscri
-- (904) 302-SEAN
> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>
>
> *From: *Jeaye
> *Sent: *Thursday, September 7, 2017 5:24 PM
> *To: *clojure@googlegro
tember 7, 2017 5:24 PM
To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha20
All of our tests are passing with this, so it looks good to me.
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:48:51PM -0700, Alex Miller wrote:
> Clojure 1.9.0-alpha20 is now available.
>
> Try it
All of our tests are passing with this, so it looks good to me.
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:48:51PM -0700, Alex Miller wrote:
> Clojure 1.9.0-alpha20 is now available.
>
> Try it via
>
> - Download: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.9.0-alpha20
> - Leiningen: [org.cloj
Clojure 1.9.0-alpha20 is now available.
Try it via
- Download: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.9.0-alpha20
- Leiningen: [org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-alpha20"]
1.9.0-alpha20 includes the following changes since 1.9.0-alpha19:
- CLJ-1074 - (new) add new ## reader macro for sym
16 matches
Mail list logo
