It has been discussed here (beta1 timeframe) and the horse is dead. :)
On Monday, March 24, 2014 2:08:53 AM UTC-5, Christian Johansen wrote:
>
> Thanks for all your hard work on this!
>
> One thought: I like the idea behind some? and friends, but the naming seems
> misleading to me. In most APIs t
Sean Johnson writes:
Hi Sean,
> I get the following warning when using 1.6.0-RC3
>
> WARNING: record? already refers to: #'clojure.core/record? in namespace:
> clojure.core.logic, being replaced by: #'clojure.core.logic/record?
>
> when requiring [clojure.core.logic :refer (run* membero distinc
Clojure 1.6 added a record? predicate so core.logic's is now colliding and
core.logic will need to address that I think.
On Monday, March 24, 2014 7:14:00 AM UTC-5, Sean Johnson wrote:
>
> I get the following warning when using 1.6.0-RC3
>
> WARNING: record? already refers to: #'clojure.core/reco
I get the following warning when using 1.6.0-RC3
WARNING: record? already refers to: #'clojure.core/record? in namespace:
clojure.core.logic, being replaced by: #'clojure.core.logic/record?
when requiring [clojure.core.logic :refer (run* membero distincto ==)]
Doesn't happen with 1.5.1.
Exclud
Thanks for all your hard work on this!
One thought: I like the idea behind some? and friends, but the naming seems
misleading to me. In most APIs that have an every?-like function, there is a
corresponding some? or any?. In Clojure this is not the case, but we do have
every? and some, which provid
Clojure 1.6.0-RC3 is now available.
Try it via
- Download: http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.6.0-RC3
- Leiningen: [org.clojure/clojure "1.6.0-RC3"]
See the full change log here:
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md
Clojure 1.6.0-RC3 has the following chan
