Ah. Makes sense. Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this gr
Metadata attaches to the form following it, so I would read this (with my
Clojure Reader hat on) as:
( read list begin
meta read symbol
#_ read and discard next form
^ read meta and form, then apply meta to form
:hello read key
Hi Alex -
Not sure if this is a bug or spec'd behavior. When combining the reader
literal for comments with the reader literal for metadata, I get unexpected
behavior:
> (meta #_^:hello [])
>
yields a compilation error. I get the same error in 1.9.0.
On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 8:43
On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 6:42:47 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback! I assume the spec one was a bad import statement?
>
Yes, exactly.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email
Thanks for the feedback!!
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:36 AM 'Avi Flax' via Clojure <
clojure@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> My test suite passes just fine. My project uses Java interop for various
> things, including watching the filesystem for changes (via JNA), clipboard
> IO, image processing, etc.
My test suite passes just fine. My project uses Java interop for various
things, including watching the filesystem for changes (via JNA), clipboard
IO, image processing, etc. Also some spec and core.async in there too.
--
Our Mission: To build a better financial world
Unless specifically
Thanks for the feedback! I assume the spec one was a bad import statement?
> On Dec 12, 2018, at 12:44 AM, Mars0i wrote:
>
> I have a couple of small apps that use interop pretty heavily because the
> Java library I'm using is very inheritance-based. There are no problems
> running with RC5
I have a couple of small apps that use interop pretty heavily because the
Java library I'm using is very inheritance-based. There are no problems
running with RC5 (although spec did find a syntax error that had passed in
1.9). I don't use reflection explicitly, but turning on
*warn-on-reflec
And as you can no doubt imagine, we are already testing it at World Singles
Networks (albeit on OpenJDK 8).
Sean
On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 1:37:42 PM UTC-8, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> 1.10.0-RC5 is now available. Please test, particularly if your
> library/application uses interop calls and
