On Jul 8, 2013, at 6:35 PM, Steven Degutis wrote:
> Thanks for this series Mimmo, I found it the other day and it helped me to
> get my feet wet with Cljs.
I'm glad you found it useful
>
> I was wondering, is there any reason you chose Domina instead of Dommy?
The main reason is that dommy wa
Thanks Chas,
I'll take a look asap.
Mimmo
On Jul 8, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Chas Emerick wrote:
> Looks like another great installment in the series!
>
> One note: I've been working on giving cljx a bit of a facelift of late to
> address some pitfalls of it using Clojure's reader. The result is in
Thanks for this series Mimmo, I found it the other day and it helped me to
get my feet wet with Cljs.
I was wondering, is there any reason you chose Domina instead of Dommy?
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Giacomo Cosenza wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just pushed the 16th tutorial of the modern-cljs se
Looks like another great installment in the series!
One note: I've been working on giving cljx a bit of a facelift of late to
address some pitfalls of it using Clojure's reader. The result is in the
'sjacket' branch of cljx here:
https://github.com/lynaghk/cljx/tree/sjacket
As the bra
Hi all,
I just pushed the 16th tutorial of the modern-cljs series. By using the
clojurescript.test lib and the cljx lein plugin I was able to make the unit
tests portable on both the client-side and the server-side of a web app. To me
this is very important, because allows to potentially move a
