Colin,
I've added an issue to explore composable features for a future HugSQL
release:
https://github.com/layerware/hugsql/issues/12
All ideas welcome! Thanks!
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Robin Heggelund Hansen <
skinney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fantastic release Curtis. This is an awesom
Fantastic release Curtis. This is an awesome work!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
Colin,
This is a great question, and I concede that the compose-ability of
HoneySQL (and other DSLs) is almost always going to best HugSQL for the
simple reason that a Lisp is a better tool for composing than SQL is.
You could feasibly accomplish some composable queries by using HugSQL's Raw
SQL
Congrats Curtis - this looks great.
I do have one question: you compare in http://www.hugsql.org/#faq-dsls HugSQL
with HoneySQL, however, the one killer feature that I use HoneySQL for is
composable queries - or rather building up the Clojure data map through
composition before rendering it as
I'm happy to announce the 0.3.0 release of HugSQL.
HugSQL is a Clojure library for embracing SQL in your projects.
This is a significant release because of the new documentation site:
http://www.hugsql.org/
Recent changes from 0.2.x to 0.3.0 include:
- New doc site!
- Comparison to Yes
