Re: *math-context*

2009-07-10 Thread Rich Hickey
On Jul 10, 9:44 am, John Harrop wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Rich Hickey wrote: > > On Jul 10, 9:01 am, Chouser wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:14 AM, John Harrop > > wrote: > > > > It would be useful to have a *math-context

Re: *math-context*

2009-07-10 Thread John Harrop
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Rich Hickey wrote: > On Jul 10, 9:01 am, Chouser wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:14 AM, John Harrop > wrote: > > > It would be useful to have a *math-context* or similar that had a > sensible > > > default and could be

Re: *math-context*

2009-07-10 Thread Rich Hickey
On Jul 10, 9:01 am, Chouser wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:14 AM, John Harrop wrote: > > It would be useful to have a *math-context* or similar that had a sensible > > default and could be set with binding to affect bigdec calculations within > > the temporal

Re: *math-context*

2009-07-10 Thread Chouser
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:14 AM, John Harrop wrote: > It would be useful to have a *math-context* or similar that had a sensible > default and could be set with binding to affect bigdec calculations within > the temporal scope of said binding. user=> (binding [*

*math-context*

2009-07-10 Thread John Harrop
It would be useful to have a *math-context* or similar that had a sensible default and could be set with binding to affect bigdec calculations within the temporal scope of said binding. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to