On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:48 PM, James Reeves wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 10:29 pm, Cosmin Stejerean wrote:
> > Can you help me understand the difference between this and use (or :use
> in
> > ns)?
>
> use is internal to the current namespace. You can use other namespaces
> without their publics being
On Jan 26, 10:29 pm, Cosmin Stejerean wrote:
> Can you help me understand the difference between this and use (or :use in
> ns)?
use is internal to the current namespace. You can use other namespaces
without their publics being added to the current namespace. So:
=> (ns a)
=> (def x 10)
=> (ns
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:20 PM, James Reeves wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've recently found myself having to choose between dividing
> functionality between many specific namespaces, or having a few very
> generic namespaces. In theory, being specific is the better choice, as
> it allows users to m
Hi folks,
I've recently found myself having to choose between dividing
functionality between many specific namespaces, or having a few very
generic namespaces. In theory, being specific is the better choice, as
it allows users to more accurately pick what they want to use. But if
most of the time
