Enlive (also Christophe Grand's) is definitely a project you'll want
to check out: http://github.com/cgrand/enlive
Pairing enlive with David Nolan's tutorial (http://github.com/
swannodette/enlive-tutorial/) allows you to consume the codebase in
bite-sized pieces (read about a feature in the tutor
Looks like I'm a bit late to the party on this one.
ClojureDocs, as Tom mentioned, dosen't currently track the :deprecated
metadata entry, which will be fixed once clojuredocs is able to
consume autodoc's output.
Apologies for the confusion.
-Zack
On Oct 27, 12:57 am, Btsai wrote:
> Awesome!
Hey All,
ClojureDocs is now in beta, relevant info below.
Site: http://clojuredocs.org
Beta Info: http://clojuredocs.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/clojuredocs-beta/
Main Repo: http://github.com/zkim/clojuredocs
Thanks, Zack.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Mark-
ATM, autodoc is your best bet for automatically generating
documentation from your source files.
The ClojureDocs lib analyzer codebase is pretty much a ns / var
metadata extraction tool, similar to autodoc. Unfortunately out of
the five requirements you listed [1] we only (automatically) t
Tom-
Definitely helps, I'll add this on the next var update cycle.
Thanks, Zack.
On Jul 18, 12:17 pm, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> What I've noticed is that conventions on doc string indentation is all
> over the place. Combine that with the fact that folks build tables and
> columns by hand, and a r
Islon- See the week 1 post on the CD.org group (http://
groups.google.com/group/clojuredocsorg/browse_thread/thread/
af7edbf85a6607c4) as to where this fits in on the timeline.
Lee- Very cool, I've added it to the UserVoice page.
Daniel- I agree, a great search experience is key for documentation
Hi All-
I've just posted a summary of feedback and the plan moving forward for
ClojureDocs.org (http://groups.google.com/group/clojuredocsorg/
browse_thread/thread/af7edbf85a6607c4). If you're interested in being
involved in shaping the site please take a look (and sign up for the
group).
I'd li
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:23 PM, zkim wrote:
> >>> but what do you think about using Justin's codebase, or an Aleph-based
> >>> server to
> >>> host the thing instead of Ruby/Rails? (see t
Lukasz-
> Hoping for the categories to arrive to the core namespace. This really
> saves a lot of time for a clojure beginner like me.
The way Justin did this is great (http://clojure-examples.appspot.com/
clojure.core). I'm hoping to add this in the near future.
> Additionally, I'd prefer if th
n the Clojure web space (even just since May). It's a tough problem
to get right, and I'm definitely willing to help those that have taken
up this difficult challenge any way I can.
-Zack
On Jul 11, 8:14 am, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:23 PM, zkim wrote:
&g
Stu-
> (2) +1 on hiding private APIs. We use private APIs carefully and
> deliberately in Clojure, and I would hate to facilitate people
> writing code that will break later.
That's +4 on this one by my tally, I'll pull the private vars.
> (3) +1 on making it very easy to see which version of a
Shantanu-
> One suggestion -- consider providing a downloadable
> bundle for offline use as well.
I believe there's an item up on the UserVoice page (http://
clojuredocs.uservoice.com/) keep an eye out for updates and comments
there.
-Zack
On Jul 10, 3:29 am, Shantanu Kumar wrote:
> This is g
Heinz-
> first of all, great effort there :) having a place for clojure docs is
> awesome.
Thanks, appreciated.
> 1) http://github.com/defn/walton - have a look at it, it might be a
> good way to fetch examples for functions where none are provided yet.
I'll take a look.
> 2) Will it be po
(example map)
> >> clojure.core/map (since 1.0)
>
> >> (map inc [1 2 3 4 5])
> >> (2 3 4 5 6)
>
> >> There are of course many variants of some functions and different
> >> forms of use, so dealing with the best way to provide useful help
> >&
re of course many variants of some functions and different
> > forms of use, so dealing with the best way to provide useful help
> > without an overwhelming number of examples is tricky in the repl, but
> > I think worth doing. Along with doc and source, I think example would
>
explicitly included by the user?
-Zack
On Jul 9, 2:06 pm, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> Quick thought: You probably don't want to include private vars.
>
> On Jul 9, 1:32 am, zkim wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi All,
>
> > I'll try to keep this short.
>
> > I've gott
ressed interest in making code contributions.
>
> Zack, you had mentioned you planned to keep the source of your site
> proprietary -- is that set in stone?
>
> Justin
>
> On Jul 9, 12:21 pm, David Nolen wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:32 AM, zkim wrote:
I've put these suggestions up on the UserVoice page, I believe I got
all of them, but if I missed yours please add it yourself or let me
know.
Dimitri: I share your frustrations with having to remember yet another
login / password. Other than minor cosmetic fixes, improving the user
signup / login
.
On Jul 9, 10:30 am, ".Bill Smith" wrote:
> Having contributed a lot of examples to clojure-examples.appspot.com
> this week, I agree that it would be a shame to duplicate efforts.
>
> On Jul 9, 11:21 am, David Nolen wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:32
Hi All,
I'll try to keep this short.
I've gotten a lot out of Clojure: I can honestly say that learning
this language, and being part of this community has made me a better,
happier developer, and I wanted to give something back.
One of the pain points that I encountered when learning the langua
20 matches
Mail list logo
