Ok the SCA agrrement says we can actually print/sign/scan the
agreement ans den it via e-mail.
Is this a possibility for Clojure or postal mail is the only one and
true way?
Cheers, V.Seguí
On 18 jun, 09:28, vseguip wrote:
> Thanks for the link, I hadn't seen it. It seems like an over
ers,
V. Seguí
On 17 jun, 21:12, "J. McConnell" wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:55 PM, vseguip wrote:
>
> > or is there a preferred way to communicate patches?
>
> This is new:
>
> http://clojure.org/patches
>
> - J.
--~--~-~--~~
Currently Clojure adds source and line information in the cause string
to exceptions thrown when compiling. This makes it difficult for
slime to highlight this errors as it actually has to parse the cause
message to get the source and file. This regex parsing fails in my
system (I have fixed the
ed I will
send the patch to ML.
Cheers,
V. Segui
On 26 mar, 23:08, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> vseguip writes:
> > Hi I tried your code but still no luck with errors.
>
> Then I don't know. I use ut-to-date versions of swank-clojure,
> clojure-mode, SLIME and clojure all from
Hi I tried your code but still no luck with errors. This is what I get
from the*slime events* buffer:
(:emacs-rex
(swank:compile-file-for-emacs "/home/vseguip/uoc/IA2/practica/
main.clj" t 'nil)
"practica-main" t 5)
(:indentation-update
(("rec-seq" .
Just responding to myself, the issue seems to have been fixed by
itself. OTOH compiler errors don't popup like before. I can see them
in the *SLIME Compilation* buffer but clicking on them doesn't lead to
the source code. The faulty lines are also not highlighted in anyway
way now. Is this correct
On 24 mar, 05:29, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Vagif Verdi writes:
> > When i use slime with lisp, it shows me function parameters, when
> > cursor is on a function name. But with clojure it only shows me
> > Evaluation Aborted. Is this because that feature not implemented, or i
> > setup something
