Another question, using jig, the connection/db/cache/storage will be
everywhere in our code as a parameter of functions, is it flexible?
,currently I prefer to managing those side effect at one place but will not
spread out to our other core functions.
Thanks
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 12:
+1
On Friday, October 18, 2013 7:30:20 AM UTC+8, zcaudate wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to put up a video of a typical workflow example with
> pedestal. It's quite difficult for me to piece everything together just by
> reading the documentation.
>
> Chris
>
--
--
You received this message
Hi,
I have a question, if there are a sequence of fn like (f1) (f2) (f3) ,I
just want to return the evaluation of last fn, for example
((f1)
(f2)
(f3))
now I can do it by
(let []
(f1)
(f2)
(f3))
I am not sure if there is another solution for it.
Thanks
Hi,
Is clojure under dev? there is no much commits in months, any plan or road
map for clojure?
thanks
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new membe
It brother me too.
Thanks
On Friday, July 5, 2013 3:28:54 AM UTC+8, Hussein B. wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How core.async compares to agents, future and promise?
>
> When to use core.async and when to use agents, future and promise?
>
> Thanks for help and time.
>
--
--
You received this message becaus
(*store-string-kv* key value mutable/charset)))
I am not sure if anybody would like to improve it to be more usable.
Thanks
Julius
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@go
"1.3" branch by Jeff, that works with Leiningen.
Thanks!
- Julius
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Jeff Rose wrote:
> Cool! I experimented a little bit with Church a while back, but
> having something like this in Clojure could be really interesting. I
> don't have muc
