So it sounds like your choice would be compojure-api, correct?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:28 AM Erik Assum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On my current project, we’re using compojure with liberator. It works, but
> there are a few down sides as far as I can see:
> Compojure is opaque, eg the routing is express
I'll definitely try that again, but since I'm not read to get specific yet,
I'm still working at a 'fuzzy logic' level. I'm especially interested in
what is most popular, current, and has a lot of community support.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:11 PM Edward Knyshov wrote:
> Did you try to narrow dow
Ah, ok. I’ve not used with-redefs. I’ll give it a shot.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:23 AM Patrik Sundberg
wrote:
> I tend to add a path to my :resource-paths in boot for dev-only things.
> You can do the same with lein (and hopefully any other build tool you use).
>
> I'm not sure I got your quest
Will do.
I was hoping to get something up and running quickly for demo purposes, but
that might not be practical. It depends on how quickly I hear back from the
author.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 1:38 AM Sean Corfield wrote:
> Please keep me posted on how that goes. The Zero-Ltd version is a fork
Yes, that’s exactly the one I’m looking at. I emailed the recent
contributor. We’ll see what happens
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 6:06 PM Sean Corfield wrote:
> Which clj-soap are you talking about?
>
>
>
> There are several unmaintained forks of the original project lying around.
>
>
>
> This se
Hmm, that might be useful. I assume it would make sense for an API called
from other apps, but not so much for internal web services called from your
own client app.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:04 AM Peter Hull wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 4 December 2016 15:11:55 UTC, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
>>
>> That
That did the trick. Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:29 PM Alex Miller wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, December 16, 2016 at 10:59:50 AM UTC-6, Jonathon McKitrick
> wrote:
>
> I've run into some odd namespace issues with clojure.spec, and I'm sure
> it's because I'm doing something wrong. I have this i
I read too quickly. I might need multi-methods after all, just like I used
in Common Lisp. I want different types of persisted objects to have the
same interface, if possible.
Actually, I'm just experimenting with protocols, so I'm probably better off
looking for a different use case.
On Mon, Aug
Makes perfect sense. Thanks!
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:09 PM Jonathan Fischer
wrote:
> The most straightforward one: just make your protocols a thing that your
> storage medium implements, instead of your records. E.g.:
>
> (defprotocol ThingStore
> (load-item [store item-id])
> (load-items
It would be great if you'd upload it to clojars. I'll start working with it
immediately after that, and hopefully it will do the trick.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:53 PM wrote:
> Great! I'll give it a try!
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:51 PM Karl Blomström
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathon! I am working
Great! I'll give it a try!
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:51 PM Karl Blomström
wrote:
> Hi Jonathon! I am working on a client library for retrieving oauth2
> tokens. Have a look here: https://github.com/blmstrm/loudmoauth and here
> for example usage:
> https://github.com/blmstrm/loudmoauth-examples/
11 matches
Mail list logo
