How large is your Clojure codebase?
On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 6:33:42 AM UTC-7, Chris Ford wrote:
>
> A little more context on what I'm considering.
>
> I work in a team of about 10 developers on a Clojure project. In the
> larger enterprise there are mainly Java applications.
>
> I'm intereste
hy that's a bad idea).
On Friday, May 30, 2014 7:35:53 AM UTC-7, squeegee wrote:
>
>
> On May 30, 2014, at 12:57 AM, ian.tegebo >
> wrote:
>
> I don't see the reason why def should behave as it currently does; it
> seems like it should lookup the current thread-
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 8:43:58 PM UTC-7, squeegee wrote:
>
>
> On May 29, 2014, at 7:11 PM, ian.tegebo >
> wrote:
>
> user> (binding [*ns* (the-ns 'blah)] (defn foo []))
> #'user/foo
> user> (binding [*ns* (the-ns 'blah)] (eval '(defn f
I went to write a context macro so that I could define functions in another
namespace. After the obligatory googling, I found "with-ns":
http://richhickey.github.io/clojure-contrib/with-ns-api.html
Clicking through to look at the source, I was surprised to see that "eval"
was being wrapped aro
On Monday, March 24, 2014 10:54:53 AM UTC-7, guns wrote:
>
> On Mon 24 Mar 2014 at 10:24:11AM -0700, ian.tegebo wrote:
> > I found a stackoverflow question discussing :const metadata, but I can't
> > seem to find any official clojure docs about it. Are you aware of any
I found a stackoverflow question discussing :const metadata, but I can't
seem to find any official clojure docs about it. Are you aware of any?
Well, to be fair, I see it mentioned on the cheatsheet but I can't find any
further explanation:
http://clojure.org/cheatsheet
On Monday, March 24, 20
I'm interested in converting javadoc to docstrings in cases like
"amazonica" where clojure code is created by reflecting on java classes.
Unless I missed something, the status quo has us referring to the original
Javadoc via web browser. One then needs to understand enough of the
conversion t
tl;dr
Is anyone working on a Clojure-Specific Emacs Environment? If considered
but dismissed, then why?
I've just reviewed a thread about nREPL. The thread also (somewhat
indirectly) calls into question the current practice of piggy-backing on
SLIME:
"About a networked REPL..."
https
