In fact it has been corrected in the clojure svn.Sorry for the noise,
Gaetan
2009/1/26 gaetan
>
> I am not sure of that but it may come, as Eric suggest, from the
> import function in core.clj. Indeed this function is based on
> Class#forName which use Reflection#getCallerClass
debug
session could help to find the root cause of the problem
Gaetan
On 26 jan, 21:49, bOR_ wrote:
> Thanks for that solution. Ran into the same problem as well, and right
> now I don't want to solve it, but just finish something else.
>
> On Dec 13 2008, 11:21 pm, Eric Sessoms
2009/1/26 Laurent PETIT
> 2009/1/26 gaetan
>
>> On 26 jan, 13:29, Laurent PETIT wrote:
>> > Hello Gaetan,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the shared code. I think that for a first version in
>> clojuredev,
>> > I'll too just implement the ful
On 26 jan, 13:29, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> Hello Gaetan,
>
> Thanks for the shared code. I think that for a first version in clojuredev,
> I'll too just implement the full builder, and wait for performance problems
> before writing an incremental one (thus saving develop
ith a hello world action.
> 2009/1/23 Gaetan Morice
>
>
>
> > Hello Laurent,
> > thank you for your interest.
>
> > 2009/1/23 Laurent PETIT
>
> >> Hello Gaetan,
>
> >> I'm one of the core developers of clojuredev, an open source project whos
Hello Laurent,
thank you for your interest.
2009/1/23 Laurent PETIT
> Hello Gaetan,
>
> I'm one of the core developers of clojuredev, an open source project whose
> goal is to provide clojure support for the Eclipse IDE.
> What you say below is interesting, please see what
st on Eclipse E4 project mailing list (work
on the future of Eclipse) as they are very interested in dynamic
languages.
BR,
Gaetan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to t
