y occupied. ;-(
conj.us is avaliable, meaning (conjoin to us)
user=> (def us '(foo bar))
#=(var user/us)
user=> (conj us 'new-proj)
(new-proj foo bar)
On 11월18일, 오후2시29분, cwyang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about 'conj'?
>
> conj is (1) for 'conj&#x
How about 'conj'?
conj is (1) for 'conj' in Clojure, and (2) for abbrev of 'conjure',
meaning (Conjuring Clojure).
'cons' for lisp, and 'conj' for clojure. :-)
--
Chul-Woong Yang
On Nov 18, 4:52 am, Drew Crampsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I've finally found some time to start g
Thanks everyone.
I've read all the replies, and I might understand something.
(Though it seems that discussion goes to beyond my current
understanding in the middle of this discussion threads)
To explore further, I become another owner of 'Programming
Clojure' :-)
For my second question, I'll ke
Hi all.
First of all, thanks for the joyful language, Clojure.
I am having struggle in understanding functional programming,
which Clojure dictates.
Though I'm not a big fan of object oriented programming,
I totally agree with the model of objects - objects and methods,
entities and functions i
