On Nov 2, 11:40 am, Sergey Didenko wrote:
> Seems like a bug:
>
> The following compiles:
>
> (let [[^Double x ^Double y] [0.1 0.2]] (+ x y))
>
> This does not:
>
> (let [[^double x ^double y] [0.1 0.2]] (+ x y))
>
> "Unable to resolve classname: double"
This is CLJ-852. Applying the patch posted
On Feb 24, 7:07 am, "bsmith.occs" wrote:
> On Feb 23, 11:46 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim
> wrote:
>
> > Have you figured this out yet?
>
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jeffrey Straszheim <
>
> > straszheimjeff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > &
On Feb 23, 11:46 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim
wrote:
> Have you figured this out yet?
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jeffrey Straszheim <
>
> straszheimjeff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The identifier "fibl" is holding on to the head of the sequence.
Yes, this works:
(defn fibl []
((fn h [a b]
;;
-
;; using clojure.jar from source r1301
;;
;; I'm new to clojure and working from B7.0 of Programming Clojure.
;; This version still uses lazy-cons. Nevertheless I'm trying to grok
lazy-seq
;; as described here: http://cloju
