Indeed you're right, the drop lazy-seq prevents the lookahead.
Thanks Meikel for the thoughtful response!
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 2:36:26 AM UTC-4, Meikel Brandmeyer
(kotarak) wrote:
>
> In fact, (doall (take (count t) t)) actually realises t completely. But
> not because of the doall o
Hi all:
I think I encountered a problem in the clojure.core/take produces lazy
sequences, and I wanted to run it by some folks to confirm it was indeed a
bug.
In a nutshell, clojure.core/take produces lazy sequences in a way such that
(take
(count t) t) will always retain the head of its bas
