> I'm confused - what was your expectation here? In what way is Clojure
> different from CL?
>
> Rich
Nothing is different. Sorry i wasn't very explicit. That's the way a
special should work, and expecting a different behaviour for lazyness
h* 100))
(lambda () *bleh*))
#
CL-USER 3 > (funcall *)
10
So I guess it's the cost of lazyness ! I'll just pass the indent
parameter around. It will be a problem to always do without specials
though.
Thanks
Sacha
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You re
ound
at evaluation time.
So I guess this makes perfect sense from the implementor point of
view. But do we not loose much of the added value of special variables
this way ? If this is intended, what's the rationale ?
Thanks,
Sacha
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You r
