> De: "Sean Corfield"
> À: "clojure"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Avril 2021 01:26:34
> Objet: Re: How get function name in body?
> Consider that:
> (defn add [a b] (+ a b))
> is expanded to (something like):
> (def add (fn [a b] (+ a b)))
> So the actual code that runs is an anonymous function, which
I've moved the patch to
[ https://github.com/forax/clojure/tree/indy-reflect |
https://github.com/forax/clojure/tree/indy-reflect ]
Rémi
>> De: "Ghadi Shayban"
>> À: "clojure"
>> Envoyé: Jeudi 23 Mai 2019 05:43:46
>> Objet: Re: Use invokedynamic instead of the reflection API when possible
> De: "Ghadi Shayban"
> À: "clojure"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 23 Mai 2019 05:43:46
> Objet: Re: Use invokedynamic instead of the reflection API when possible
> Hi Rémi! What a pleasant surprise to see your name here. The whole community
> owes you a great deal of gratitude for your work.
> I'm hoping to
> De: "Alex Miller"
> À: "Clojure"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 23 Mai 2019 03:47:53
> Objet: Re: Use invokedynamic instead of the reflection API when possible
> Hi Rémi! Thanks for all your work on ASM and other JVM stuff over the years by
> the way.
> We have of course been poking at indy off and on over t
