Do any Clojure developers have experience with "dual licensing" an open
source Clojure project under the EPL with the option of a commercial
license?
I have in mind corporate customer-developers for one of my projects who
aren't comfortable with the terms of the EPL – i.e. they desire to embrac
, and that version in
turn as the basis for the version after next, and so on.
--
Michael Bradley, Jr.
@michaelsbradley
On Dec 23, 2013, at 18:12, James Reeves wrote:
> I don't have any suggestions as to how this might be achieved, I'm afraid,
> but I am very curious as to why
Is there a straightforward way to setup a Clojure library so that it can
depend on an older version of itself?
I can think of a couple of ways to do this that seem clunky, but was
wondering what approaches (if any) have worked well for other folks.
Something involving pomegranate and clojure.to
ure-related APIs could be suggested as well:
ring, Datomic, etc.
In the long run, I hope the maintainer will open source the DevDocs
platform and some docs-contribution mechanism (it's not an open platform at
present), but I find it to be a very practical and useful tool in any case.
Bes
t seem to bring one up manually.
Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.
--
Michael Bradley, Jr.
@michaelsbradley
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that pos
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:52:26 AM UTC-6, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
> Hi Tassilo
>
> > 1. Can emacs with swank dynamically update Noir code running locally,
>
>> > or do I need to save the code and then 'lein run' to see the new
>> > result?
>>
>> Without ever having used Noir, I woul
On Friday, October 26, 2012 11:06:59 AM UTC-5, Brian Craft wrote:
> I've read about four tutorials on monads so far, but it still escapes me.
>
> In fact, I'm still not sure what problem it solves. I'm familiar with the
> problem of having, say, three functions like f(a) -> b, g(c) -> d, h(e) ->
compiling / recompiling.
>
> David
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Michael Bradley, Jr. <
> michaelsbradle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for folks to help me kick the tires and push this project
>> forward:
>>
>> https://githu
ureScript the language.
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:55:52 AM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>
> Looks neat.
>
> Any reason to call the module clojure-script instead of just clojurescript?
>
> David
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Michael Bradley, Jr. <
> michaelsbradle.
I'm looking for folks to help me kick the tires and push this project
forward:
https://github.com/michaelsbradleyjr/node-clojurescript
http://search.npmjs.org/#/clojure-script
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, s
10 matches
Mail list logo