Re: is it function print has bug？

Thanks for answer my question. On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 10:59:51 PM UTC+8, Leif wrote: > > Hi, Mian Pao. > > When you call the macro te, a is bound to the *symbol* 'print, not the > *function* print. So, what the ~(a b c) form is doing is calling the > symb

Re: is this macro right?

ified, and I'll try my > best. I am unsure why you started a new thread asking the same question, > with even less context. > > --Leif > > On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 3:47:39 AM UTC-5, Mian Pao wrote: >> >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34448773

is this macro right?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34448773/is-function-print-has-bug-in-clojure -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be p

is it function print has bug？

I just write a macro ``` (defmacro te [a b & c] `(print ~(a b c))) ``` and i run ``` (macroexpand '(te print 2 3 4)) ;=> (clojure.core/print (3 4)) ``` it get `(clojure.core/print (3 4))` not `(clojure.core/print nil)` iti is mean `(print 2 '(3 4))` return (3 4)? -- You received thi