I've been able to reproduce this by deliberately building with Java
11/Clojure 1.10, then running on Java 8. Doing the same thing but built
with Java 8 is fine.
So, somehow some classes built with Java 11 must have gotten into the
build. Time to check my build cleanliness...
Thanks again, and
I am pretty sure I'm using Java 8. I do have both Java 8 and Java 11
installed, but the environment it's built with:
$ java -version
java version "1.8.0_162"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_162-b12)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.162-b12, mixed mode)
$ echo $JAVA_HOME
Hi all,
I have an inexplicable runtime error with a leiningen-generated AOT uberjar
that happens when using Clojure 1.10 that doesn't happen with 1.9 (I'm on
Java 8 for both compilation and deployment).
The code in question looks like:
(defn make-apns-message [payload]
(let [buffer (ByteBuff
Hi Alex, have just finished testing on an 18 KLOC Clojure backend service
(Java 8, Linux). Test suites and deployed service runs fine.
Let me add my thanks for your hard work!
Cheers,
Matthew.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To pos
Just for everyone's info: seems this update breaks CIDER
0.15: https://github.com/clojure-emacs/cider/issues/2081
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new m
On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 5:50:33 AM UTC+9:30, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
> On 4/6/16, 1:21 PM, "Piyush Katariya" on behalf of corporat...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > Has anybody experienced the performance boost by switching to Clojure
> version 1.8 (and direct linking) ?
>
> We switched to direct l
Hello all,
just letting anyone who might be interested know that I've posted MPEdn, an
EDN reader/writer implementation for OS X and iOS:
https://github.com/scramjet/mpedn
It's in active use in a project of mine, so I'm going to go ahead and claim
it's a stable and useful 1.0 release. Feedba
ps://github.com/brandonbloom/libclj
>
>
> 2013/2/5 Matthew Phillips >
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> a quick search of this group, and the web at large, doesn't get any hits
>> for an Obj-C EDN implementation. Is there anyone working on this?
>>
>> If not, I&
Hello,
a quick search of this group, and the web at large, doesn't get any hits
for an Obj-C EDN implementation. Is there anyone working on this?
If not, I'll likely go ahead and implement a basic subset of the EDN spec
for my own needs, which I'd be happy to share.
Cheers,
Matthew.
--
--
Hello,
my current lein-ritz (0.5.0) setup, started with slime-connect, hangs when
handling Unicode characters, e.g.
user> (def a "\uD83D\uDE1F") ; UTF-16 representation of Unicode 4 WORRIED
FACE
#'clojure.core/a
user> a
"?"
The REPL is hung at this point: in the the mini buffer I see "error i
On Friday, April 20, 2012 4:01:54 PM UTC+9:30, David Jagoe wrote:
>
>
> On 20 April 2012 07:08, Matthew Phillips wrote:
>
>> I've always liked the way assoc and dissoc return the original map
>> instance when there's no change to be made. But this is not a
I've always liked the way assoc and dissoc return the original map instance
when there's no change to be made. But this is not apparently true of
records. e.g.:
> (def m {:a 1})
> (identical? m (dissoc m :x))
; true
> (def r <>)
> (identical? r (dissoc r :x))
; false
Does anyone know if there'
On Jun 15, 12:41 pm, Christian Schuhegger
wrote:
> Ah, sorry, perhaps I misunderstand you, but if you use multimethods
> (defmulti) in Clojure you do not need to "attach" methods to anything.
> The defmulti will allow you "dispatch-on-type" based on the key which
> is present in the map (e.g. if
On Jun 15, 11:51 am, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Matthew Phillips wrote:
> > Yes. I agree that can work, and that's what I've done in some other
> > situations, but it has the downside of lots of "recur" points
> > sprinkled
On Jun 14, 4:40 pm, Alex Osborne wrote:
> Matthew Phillips writes:
> > The only way I can think of to write it in Clojure is:
>
> > (reduce
> > (fn [items op]
> > (let [items1 (if (:delete op) (drop-index (:delete op) items)
> > items)]
> >
On Jun 14, 12:30 pm, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Phillips wrote:
> > List items = initialItems ();
>
> > for (Op op : operations)
> > {
> > if (op.requiresDelete ())
> > items.remove (op.indexToDelete ());
>
>
On Jun 14, 12:05 pm, gaz jones wrote:
> if i was writing the java i would probably do a "tell dont ask"
> refactoring so that the operations had an applyTo method:
>
> List items = initialItems ();
>
> for (Op op : operations)
> {
> op.applyTo(items);
>
> }
>
> not sure what your op data structu
Hello all, I've been programming Clojure now for long enough that I'm
starting to think I'm at the point of being fluent … almost.
One area that keeps tripping me up is iteratively processing a data
structure when the processing is highly conditional and may take
several overlapping paths. An exam
On Aug 12, 10:51 pm, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> The other thing that you should consider is that protocols are the
> contract for implementers, not the contract for callers. If you
> change a contract for implementers, then the implementers *must*
> change.
>
> Take your example of a function that h
: the instance just needs to provide whichever one
is most suitable.
Matthew.
On Aug 14, 9:30 pm, Nicolas Oury wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Matthew Phillips wrote:
>
> > One idea that I tried was to use extend-type on a protocol, say to
> > extend any Node to b
Thanks to all of you who responded.
So, I think my original thesis was correct: I'm clearly misconstruing
something quite fundamental here ;)
And I can see now my original example was clumsy: for example
something like PrettyPrintable *should* be an orthogonal protocol to
Node. (Not to mention th
On Aug 14, 3:22 am, Armando Blancas wrote:
> > A more concrete example: say I've defined a protocol for AST nodes in
> > 1.0 of a library, and later when developing 2.0 I discover it would
> > have been a good idea to have a "pretty-print" method on nodes to show
> > human-readable output. If the
On Aug 14, 9:07 am, Kevin Downey wrote:
> so clients don't directly call the protocol functions they call
> print-ast which then checks to see if PrettyPrintable has been
> extended to the object and falls back to the default if it hasn't
Sure, but I'm talking about publishing protocols that clie
On Aug 14, 12:34 am, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> > Following Stuart's suggestion, I *could* just add a protocol
> > called "PrettyPrintable" with one method and implement it on some
> > of the new node types, but now I can't just call "pretty-print" on
> > any node: I need to write another function t
On Aug 13, 3:38 am, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> > Stu, (or anybody) I'd like to ask about a variation on this
> > point. How do you handle the case where you have a general
> > function that works for every type you'd like to implement a
> > protocol for (thus not technically needing to be in a proto
25 matches
Mail list logo
