ambda-list)
> [docstring forms] (parse-defun-decls decls-doc-forms)
> args-var (gensym "args")
> positional-parameters (get param-map '&positional)]
> (if docstring
> (comment ; *FINISH* docstring variant
> ;; `(defn ~functio
I don't have a Clojure REPL handy at the moment but it looks like the x symbol
is being resolved in the macro context rather than the expansion context. In
the macro source, where you have a plain x, try to replace it with ~'x ... This
blog post may be relevant:
http://amalloy.hubpages.com/hub/
Greg's is a nice and clean solution for the data visualization problem,
assuming you're only going to use partials.
I hacked together a solution to support functions with equality semantics,
if anyone is interested. It doesn't support anonymous functions or
closures, but doing that would requir
在 2014年4月25日星期五UTC-7下午12时16分22秒，Alex Miller写道：
>
>
> On Friday, April 25, 2014 1:23:49 PM UTC-5, Matthew DeVore wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for pointing out the ticket, but based on the Description, it
>> falls short of what I need. It doesn't have any additional inf
ould want the equality semantics; at
> least in the case of impure functions the equality does not hold.
>
> On Friday, April 25, 2014 11:01:37 AM UTC-5, Matthew DeVore wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There has been one thing bugging me for a long time that seems worth i
Hi,
There has been one thing bugging me for a long time that seems worth it to
fix, and I was wondering if anyone else has had the same problem. I have
enjoyed using Clojure's REPL and embracing a Clojure-style data model for
my app, where everything is a glorified map or vector and there are n
