On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Christophe Grand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Manuel Woelker
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> after digging around a bit in the clojure code, trying to get the
>> compile to work, I found out that cla
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> 2009/10/15 Manuel Woelker
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:48 AM, jng27 wrote:
>> >
>> > The following seems like it could be a common scenario when attempting
>> > to re-write parts
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> 2009/10/15 Manuel Woelker
>>
>> > How about the compiler just loads classes in a SecurityManager context
>> > that
>> > won't allow some naughtiness like System.exit()? Then you
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:48 AM, jng27 wrote:
>
> The following seems like it could be a common scenario when attempting
> to re-write parts of an existing Java application in Clojure.
>
> Let's say there exists Clojure code and Java code in the same
> 'project'.
> The Clojure code depends on the
> How about the compiler just loads classes in a SecurityManager context that
> won't allow some naughtiness like System.exit()? Then you'd get a
> CompilerException caused by ExceptionInInitializerError caused by
> SecurityException rather than have your REPL, IDE, or whatever blow up from
> code
c to the surrounding execution
context.
Cheers
- Manuel Woelker
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
>
> it seems to get chopped off part way down the page for me, of late.
> (it doesn't get chopped off in ie for me.)
>
As another datapoint, it's chopped of for me too, at "(last coll)". If
I'd have to guess I'd say it's a firefox issue though,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Christophe Grand
wrote:
>
> You can: simply load them using different class loaders -- this way you'll
> have several RT.
Yeah, that might work. I had hoped to get around dealing with multiple
classloaders and calling the RT methods via Reflection, but I guess
t
sure that would work.
Is there any hope the RT could become a proper object? It would
probably mean passing it to all involved classes (Compiler, Namespace,
etc. ). I hope I am not committing a cardinal sin asking for objects
for a functional language...
Cheers
-
