On 28/03/2013, at 18.07, Omer Iqbal wrote:
> Most foundation objective c data structures are immutable (NSArray,
> NSDictionary, NSSet etc), and are most probably more performant than clojure
> counterparts, though terribly less elegant.
> However there's the clojure-scheme project
> (https://g
Yes! Thank you for that link :)
On 27/11/2012, at 22.44, Frank Siebenlist wrote:
> Pls take a look at Bodil's recent project:
>
> https://github.com/bodil/cljs-noderepl
>
> -FS.
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:32 PM, David Nolen wrote:
>
>> It's definitely possible. I've been to meaning to merg
Great! Thanks for your quick reply (again).
I'd certainly love to look at it if you can provide a link.
What do you think about the possibility of creating some protocol for the
transport needed for a connected repl?
- Karl
On 27/11/2012, at 22.32, David Nolen wrote:
> It's definitely possibl
Ah :) Cheers,
- Karl
On 26/11/2012, at 23.03, David Nolen wrote:
> You can use `aget` for that.
>
> (aget object "someProperty")
>
> David
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Krukow wrote:
> Continuing my exploration of ClojureScript.. I'm writing a small query
> language. The syntax con
On 13/09/2012, at 20.54, Muharem Hrnjadovic wrote:
> Hello Karl,
>
> just drop me an email (ideally > 2 weeks in advance so we can announce
> and promote the event). Since this would be the first meetup about
> Clojure I thought we would target beginners to intermediate users.
Sure, will do. I d
Regarding those...
Some time ago I created a project containing only the persistent data
structures for use with Java et al.
https://github.com/krukow/clj-ds
It is the data structures only so no bootstrap penalty. There are also Java'ish
"improvements" like basic Generics and improved perfor
Thanks Sean for the detailed information. This will be really useful to me.
/Karl
On 25/05/2012, at 23.30, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Karl Krukow wrote:
>>> If I'm embedding swan
Sorry, and thanks for the info.
/Karl
On 25/05/2012, at 22.46, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Karl Krukow wrote:
>> If I'm embedding swank clojure server in non-development, the code would
>> need to start up swank - how would I do that?
>
&g
Sorry to ask what may be an obvious question to you. But what is a good way of
embedding a swank server inside a production app? I'm kind of an emacs
beginning and in development I just do lein swank and slime-connect from Emacs-
that works fine.
If I'm embedding swank clojure server in non-dev
On 15/11/2011, at 19.13, Justin Balthrop wrote:
> It wouldn't change the performance profile of existing programs because
> currently there isn't a way to concat two vectors and get a new vector. I
> don't envision changing the behavior of clojure.core/concat, that should
> still return a seq.
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011, Justin Balthrop
wrote:
> My understanding from the talk was that RRB-Trees have performance
> identical to PersistentVector as long as you don't concat or split
> them. So why not just replace the PersistentVector implementation with
> an RRB-Tree?
I guess that cou
ion in Clojure but for the various primitive types.
>
> David
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Karl Krukow wrote:
>
> On 13/11/2011, at 18.14, David Nolen wrote:
>
>> This would be awesome. From his talk it sounds like it shouldn't replace
>> PersistentV
ably ask here for
advice).
/Karl
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Krukow wrote:
> By the way, I don''t see it as a replacement for PersistentVector, but
> rather as an additional data structure, that could perhaps be put
> somewhere in contrib if it turns out well.
>
Hi,
Yes, Phil Bagwell presented that at the Conj.
I'm really interested in this stuff, so as an exercise in Clojure, I've started
thinking about how to implement it. At first I'll try and do it without looking
at Scala - if I get stuck I might peek a bit :)
If you're interested, I'll put it on
14 matches
Mail list logo
