This makes me wonder if it would make sense to create a Postgresql
plugin that adds a keyword type and other similar types, that would
allow for a more precise roundtrip between Clojure and Postgres.
Jason
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Thomas Heller wrote:
> Hey Kyle,
>
> thanks for the Feed
+1
Any clojure users have any luck with jarjar?
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 15:27:52 UTC-8, nathanmarz wrote:
>
> I've been playing around with the "jarjar" tool (
> http://code.google.com/p/jarjar/
> ) in order to package my jar to avoid dependency conflicts with other
> libs. It doesn't seem
This is a really great project. If you add LR1, you may want to retain ~LR0
as an option. My understanding is most grammars today are designed for
LALR1.
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Christophe Grand wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Jason Jackson wrote:
>
>> In retrosp
I didn't read the part about clojure/clojurescript interop.
Also, you could write a parser by hand in clojure[script], which takes a
parse table as input. The parse table can be generated with from any
language.
On Saturday, 19 May 2012 15:44:28 UTC-4, Jason Jackson wrote:
>
>
I wrote a compiler in Clojure for a 4th year course.
For parsing I used this combinator parser
library: https://github.com/jasonjckn/clarsec which is modeled after
haskell's parsec.
However the performance was kind of bad, combinator parsers in general can
be pretty slow.
In retrospect, I w
Are you trying to see if a person meets multiple requirements? Here's how:
(defrel grade person course g)
(fact grade 'Bob 'Algebra 'B)
(fact grade 'Bob 'Art 'C)
(fact grade 'John 'Algebra 'A)
(fact grade 'John 'Art 'A)
(fact grade 'Ricky 'Algebra 'D)
(fact grade 'Ricky 'Art 'A)
(defn meet
This might not sound glamorous, but reading books, and reading great code,
and code reviews is a great way to get up to speed. The explanations found
in the Joy of Clojure, and other books have been highly edited and refined;
if I ever paired up with someone, I doubt my ad-hoc verbal explanation
"But this exposes a bigger problem: when doing interactive
development,
you will end up with old definitions sticking around. You are
debugging one case of your function, and change the pattern a little.
"
Personally, I suffer from interactive development problems even with
merely using def/defn.
