Hello,
I'm not sure the proper terminology -- reading might be wrong.
The idea is I'd like to mimic behavior in most Clojure development
environments where given a buffer and a position you can find related
expressions. e.g. previous expression, enclosing expression, etc.
Preferably the resu
Hello,
I was playing around with having a lazy sequence abstracting over a paged
http request. First off, maybe this is dumb, I dunno, lemme know ;p
So (resources "url") returns a seq and no http request is made, but (take 1
(resources "url")) makes a request and (take 50 (resources "url")) ma
Hello,
I just started writing my first non-toy clojure program and I'm curious how
people handle global resources without component (or component like)
systems. I plan to make use of component but I'm trying to add new
concepts one by one.
As an example I have a scheduler (quartzile):
(def s
I'll definitely take a look but mostly just to see style :). It is a toy
app purely for learning so I can get away with duplicating a bit of effort.
Plus I only use read only end points that don't require user auth so the
api code is really short (8 lines).
--
--
You received this message b
ure.set/rename-keys { :image :images })))
>
> (defn search [term]
> (let [albums (-> (api/get {:method "album.search" :album term})
> (get-in [:results :albummatches :album] [])
> (vector))]
> {:albums (map transform-album albums)
Howdy,
I'm a clojure fan but quite new to writing clojure. I'm writing my first
app and had a few style questions.
I'm doing a web service call to the lastfm api. It returns some json like:
{
"results": {
"albummatches": {
"album": [
{
Hello,
I have client providing JSON data that is read into a map. What I'm
wondering is what is the best way to limit the data to only keys I white
list.
{ :user { :first "John" :last "Doe" :role "admin" } }
In this example I wouldn't want to read the role key. I can do
`(select-keys user [
I'm also very new but would add that 'filter' also returns a lazy sequence.
So 'for' isn't special in that regard (if I understand your comment).
I do 'filter' into 'map' a lot and seeing this question makes me realize
'for' can handle that case nicer so thanks for asking.
On Sunday, March 25,
