On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 5:30:03 AM UTC-7, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> The philosophy is - generative testing has made sure your function
> complies with the specs. So, testing the :ret and :fn properties over and
> over is redundant and serves no point.
>
> OTOH, you may encounter user- or exte
Super super excited for this feature, thanks so much for creating this.
In the runtime-validation case, the guide mentions:
1. Calling `valid?` in a precondition
2. Calling `conform` in the fn implementation
However neither of these appear to use the `fdef`/`instrument` combo, which
seems the c
Super super excited for this feature, thanks so much for creating this.
In the runtime-validation case, the guide mentions:
1. Calling `valid?` in a precondition
2. Calling `conform` in the fn implementation
However neither of these appear to use the `fdef`/`instrument` combo, which
seems the c
I agree with the stance that nil is a value and it is the responsibility of
the caller to throw if nil indicates an error in the calling context.
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 4:25:56 AM UTC+8, mattias w wrote:
>
> Clojure and Erlang are very similar, except for the syntax, macros and
> that
On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 8:39:56 AM UTC-8, David Nolen wrote:
> The release depends on ClojureScript 0.0-2719 as it leverages the new foreign
> dependency functionality to simplify development and production builds.
This is super super awesome. One observation for people trying this, if
rom, so it just hangs. We're hoping to wrap this in some kind of process
isolation that if _any_ type of error prevents returning a result within a
timeout, the whole thing gets destroyed and cleaned up.
Any thoughts greatly appreciated. Thank you!
- Elliot
--
You received this message
e a standard and/or satisfying way to solve this? Thanks.
- Elliot
[wikipedia] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handle_%28computing%29
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups
'd prefer to stick with Clojure
if possible but need to be able to handle the connection/IO-load.
Anyone know how this works and/or has tried this in a production system?
Any thoughts appreciated. Thanks!
- Elliot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
On Thursday, September 6, 2012 8:31:59 PM UTC-7, Weber, Martin S wrote:
>
> The question that's left for me is: why vectors and lists? I mean, from a
> data format perspective, and a non-clojure implementor, I'm not sure the
> distinction makes sense. After all for the _data format_, in its seria
