e instead of relying on a generic tool that inevitably
gets complicated when people discover that they want more out of it.
But of course YMMV -- I'm just trying to convey the huge benefits we
got by using such an in-language tool.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli
guage for writing your documentation. That benefit (using a
real langugae) is the central motivation for Scribble. Note also that
it's very much unlike markdown, where you can't program your
documentation language by design.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x
On Apr 1, 4:23 pm, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> Thanks very much for the link. I'm enjoying the paper. When I've
> addressed my immediate needs (with stringtemplate), I hope to return
> to it again in more depth. I have this notion, that an alternate
> reader for Clojure in the style of Scribble co
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:43 PM, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> Horrible hack, maybe, but it got me thinking. What you seem to be
> doing is moving between "code" and "literal" mode by quoting with #.
> This is a little like traditional quasi-quote...
>
> And that got me thinking about Scribble [1] ag
))
;; run #1... -> #
...
;; run #11... -> #
;; 11 runs, 3 best/worst removed, 5 left for average:
;; cpu time: 4026ms = 896ms + 3130ms gc; real time: 4026ms
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maz
sted
in making statically-typed code use unsafe operations, which can
make code run significantly faster. It's not publicly advertised,
yet, but it's not too far from it.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://b
...
> If your intention is to write a literate program, which as Knuth
> defined it, to be a piece of literature, use a tool designed for
> literature.
...and more to the point: the default mode of writing in Scribble
(again, whether you're using the literate programming library or
