itself, just like single-argument "+" and
"*" do.
Regards,
Denis Washington
[1] http://www.4clojure.com/problem/33
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegro
Am 24.09.2011 23:17, schrieb alexey.petrushin:
Hello, I'm learning Clojure (work mainly with Java and Ruby),
interested in it after reading Paul Graham and watched very
interesting presentation about persistent data structures by Rich
Hickey.
Speaking of Paul Graham, have you read "On Lisp"? It
Am 23.09.2011 17:25, schrieb Stuart Halloway:
I would have hoped that changes to refs during an transaction wouldn't
affect the in-transaction value of the ref (that is, I would have
liked the code to print 1, then 2). This way, the view of the
program's state would always be guaranteed to be con
Hi,
I really like the idea of grouping mutation in my programs into
transactions in order to reduce the number of possible states make
make reasoning about them easier (in the spirit of the mutable state
discussion of [1]) and thought that Clojure's "dosync" + refs might be
the ideal way to do thi
