Re: Confluence (http://dev.clojure.org) maintenance tonight

This maintenance has finished. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Christopher Redinger wrote: > We're going to bring Confluence down for maintenance. This will start > at 9pm Eastern. I anticipate it should only be down for less than 30 > minutes. > > -- > You received this

Confluence (http://dev.clojure.org) maintenance tonight

We're going to bring Confluence down for maintenance. This will start at 9pm Eastern. I anticipate it should only be down for less than 30 minutes. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@google

[ANN] Clojure/core Roadshow

Clojure/core wants to take our training course on the road this summer! We are looking for the cities that are the most interested in learning more about Clojure so we can bring our training there. I've posted more details about the roadshow on our blog, at: http://clojure.com/blog/2012/05/07/c

Re: Google Summer of Code 2012 - any mentors?

I've created a new page in Confluence with questions from the application. http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Google+Summer+of+Code+2012+Application+Questions If some people can take a pass at getting answers posted to those questions, I can submit the application this week. Also needed:

Re: Google Summer of Code 2012 - any mentors?

Core has not submitted the application. The application process just opened Monday and goes until March 9th. There have been some leaders among Clojure/dev that have stepped up to organize things. Keep watching http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Google+Summer+of+Code+2012 for more details

All Contributor Agreements from the Clojure/conj have been added

Over 50 new CAs have been signed. If you have signed one, you should see your name on this list: http://clojure.org/contributing. Thanks everybody! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegr

Re: Clojure Conj extracurricular activities spreadsheet

On Thursday, November 3, 2011 3:46:40 PM UTC-4, David Nolen wrote: > > Any thoughts about when / where these events can take place? Is it > possible to get access to a projector? Or do we have to fend for ourselves? > We have modified the contract with the hotel to keep the projector in the main

Re: Clojure Conj extracurricular activities spreadsheet

On Friday, November 4, 2011 9:16:08 PM UTC-4, Fogus wrote: > > At this point it would be great if a Conj-planning heavyweight could > step in and provide some additional ideas... although solutions would > be great too. :-) > Oh, I guess that's me. See the floorplan

[ANN] Clojure 1.3 Released

Ben Smith-Mannschott Benjamin Teuber Brian Hurt Chas Emerick Chouser Christophe Grand Christopher Redinger Colin Jones Cosmin Stejerean Daniel Solano Gómez David Miller David Powell David Rupp Fogus George Jahad Jason Wolfe Juha Arpiainen Justin Balthrop Kevin Dow

Clojure/conj 2011 Early Bird Pricing ends today!

Hey all! Just wanted to drop you all a quick note to remind you that today is the last day of early bird pricing for Clojure/conj. We now have as many attendees registered as we had in attendance last year. So this event is really shaping up to be a fantastic Clojure conference. The full sched

[ANN] Clojure 1.3 RC0

Clojure 1.3 RC0 is now available at http://clojure.org/downloads Changes since Beta 3: * Optimization should not demote BigInts (CLJ-836) * Added Intrinsics * fix nary-inline so *unchecked-math* works again Please download it and let us know how it works for you. 1.3 is getting close. -- You

Re: Swarming experiment at Conj?

On Thursday, September 8, 2011 5:36:17 PM UTC-4, Brian Marick wrote: > > I'd be willing to do the implementation work to allow us to run this > experiment at the Conj during after-hours or other hacking time. I'd need to > know there were interested participants and someone from the Conj > organ

[ANN] Clojure 1.3 Beta 3

Clojure 1.3 Beta 3 is now available at http://clojure.org/downloads The list of changes: * Load resources when baseLoader() is null (CLJ-673) * Equiv overload added for primitive booleans * Documentation updates for juxt and defrecord (CLJ-815, CLJ-736 respectively) We think this is ready to b

Re: Problem with ClojureScript and Node.js

I checked in a change this morning that fixes this. On Wednesday, August 17, 2011 11:25:54 AM UTC-4, Mark McGranaghan wrote: > > > > On Jul 28, 4:50 pm, Anthony Grimes wrote: > > Oh! I apologize. I was replying via the google interface and didn't > realize > > it wasn't quoting. Here is a link

[ANN] Clojure 1.3 Beta 2

Clojure 1.3 Beta 2 is now available at http://clojure.org/downloads The list of changes: * clojure.test/*/*-report vars made dynamic for use with external tools. * Calls favor arg vectors :tag over var :tag (CLJ-811) * BigInt ops made faster when values are small enough to be treated

Re: Clojure/conj 2011 Call For Speakers Ends Soon - Aug 19th!

On Friday, August 12, 2011 2:42:04 PM UTC-4, Christopher Redinger wrote: > > Speakers will receive: > * A catered speakers dinner on Thursday night. > Correction: Wednesday night. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure"

Clojure/conj 2011 Call For Speakers Ends Soon - Aug 19th!

Call For Speakers Clojure/conj 2011 Raleigh, NC Nov 10-12th, 2011 http://clojure-conj.org This is a reminder that the Call for Speakers for the second annual Clojure/conj is ending soon - August 19th at midnight Eastern to be exact! We would still love to receive your abstracts for this conferen

[ANN] ClojureScript

In case you missed the announcement streamed from this evening's NYC Clojure Group. https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript Clojure to JS compiler. Power of Clojure. Reach of JavaScript. Please use this Clojure mailing list for ClojureScript discussion. We plan to have a recording of tonight'

Re: Anyone on Google+ yet?

I am also on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/1/103589339577092342191 Please freel free to add me to you Clojure circles. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts

Re: Clojure 1.3 Alpha 7

On Monday, May 16, 2011 4:42:15 AM UTC-4, Tassilo Horn wrote: > > Is there already a bug report for the hash collisions on protocol > dispatch? > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-801 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to th

Re: Clojure 1.3 Alpha 7

On Sunday, May 15, 2011 8:34:06 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: > > I'm not on alpha7 yet, but what about (case 49 "1" 'string 49 'int)? > "1" hashes to 49, so there's a hash collision. > user=> (case 49 "1" 'string 49 'int) int -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr

Re: bit-clear broken in alpha7?

On Saturday, May 14, 2011 7:21:06 PM UTC-4, Praki wrote: > > bit-clear documentation doesn't explicitly state that index is zero- > based but I would think so. Alpha7 seems to have broken this function. > Thanks, I've created CLJ-795 and put it into Release.next. http://dev.clojure.org/jira/br

Re: Clojure 1.3 Alpha 7

On Sunday, May 15, 2011 1:14:20 PM UTC-4, Tassilo Horn wrote: > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No distinct mapping found > at clojure.core$min_hash.invoke (core.clj:5805) > Can you supply a small example where this is happening? For reference, this code that failed in alpha6: user=>

Re: Clojure 1.3 Alpha 7

> You are correct, it was added in Alpha 7. Christopher Redinger Clojure/core http://clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new mem

Clojure 1.3 Alpha 7

ng-target" snapshots). If you are the kind of person who used to track master by building from source, but no longer do so because you are using maven or leiningen, alpha releases are for you. Christopher Redinger Clojure/core http://clojure.com -- You received this message because you are

Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - CA Status

Hi Bruno, Unless Rich has received your CA within the past couple weeks, I would say he never received it. The compete list of CAs that he is received (within the past couple weeks) is here: http://clojure.org/contributing I'm assuming you sent it to the PO Box listed? Did you do anything spec

Re: Who's using Clojure?

We've got a good start to the list going http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Clojure+Success+Stories Any more we should get listed? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com No

Re: Clojure group in DFW area

ch...@rubedoinc.com wrote: > Rubedo, inc. > 14580 Beltwood Pkwy E Suite 103 > Farmers Branch, TX 75244 > > When: 630PM Monday May 2nd > What: Clojure Interest Group > Topic: 1st meeting, what our goals are, and how to take over the world > with Clojure Hi Chris! Thanks for offering to host the gro

Re: Who's using Clojure?

that we can post alongside the description. We'll gather this information post the results here as a one-stop place to send people that want the answer to this question. I'll update that page as I receive info. -- Christopher Redinger http://clojure.com -- You received this message because

Re: Clojure Conj 2011 Call For Speakers Now Open

On Tuesday, April 5, 2011 2:29:39 PM UTC-4, Sam Aaron wrote: > > Are you really requiring two abstracts or is that just a nice bit of > cheese? > We'd really like a minimum of two proposals. Just like last year, we'd like to have a unifying theme throughout the talks. It could end up being the

Clojure Conj 2011 Call For Speakers Now Open

If you are interested in speaking at this year's Clojure Conj, please send us your talk ideas! Visit http://clojure-conj.org for more details. -- Christopher Redinger http://clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" gr

Clojure Conj 2011, save the date! Nov 10-12 in Durham

again this year! -- Christopher Redinger http://clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient

Re: Release.Next Version Number

t version 1.3. If you are in the camp of not caring what the next version number is, then you do not have a strong objection. I.e. you are not "morally opposed." On Feb 22, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Christopher Redinger wrote: > As you can see on the Release.Next Planning page [1], there

Release.Next Version Number

http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Release.Next+Planning -- Christopher Redinger http://clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members

TriClojure

Hey all! Just wanted to announce that we have formed TriClojure, the Triangle Clojure Users Group. Tomorrow night, Jan 11th, we are co-hosting with TriFunc a talk from Clojure/core member Aaron Bedra title "Building Analytics with Incanter & Compojure." If you are in the area, please drop by the R