On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Mike Meyer
wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 00:09:41 -0500
> Christopher Petrilli wrote:
>> For example, the following projects REQUIRE contributor agreements, in
>> writing, signed and either scanned or on paper, prior to accepting any
>
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> Perhaps. But it's well known that any barrier to participation causes
> a percentage drop in same.
This topic keeps coming up, and while a large number of people have
signed CAs (many of us at the conference last year), people keep
citing it as
I was thinking that it would be handy if the "badges" next year had
space for that. I'd be happy to whip up something to collect the data
and print the badges.
Chris
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Alexy Khrabrov
wrote:
> I'd really like to meet everybody from IRC and github, but apparently mi
Before going down this road, I'd strongly recommend reading Ross
Anderson's paper "Programming Satan's Computer":
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/satan.pdf
In addition, Ross has generously put the first edition of his book
"Security Engineering" online:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/book.
I didn't do any timing, but, I would say the idiomatic way:
(apply str (interpose ", " some-vector))
Chris
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:18 PM, andrei wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I work with a database and need a function, that will convert Clojure
> sequence to a string with a comma-separated element
I'll be driving down from DC, and probably arriving between 5-6. Just
as a note, I'd highly recommend not being anywhere near DC between
4-8p due to traffic. It could easily add 2 hours to your trip.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Kyle R. Burton wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Several of us are car pool
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Dan wrote:
> Once a month, we get a proposal about how to remove the parens so that the
> language would be more usable for newbies who are afraid of them. Invariably
> this turns out into experienced clojure users telling that the parens aren't
> a problem and that
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Sean Devlin wrote:
> As most of you know, Oracle is rapidly rebranding the sun website.
> It's a matter of time before they get to the Javadocs. Given the
> following:
>
> 1. Oracle doesn't play nice (putting it lightly)
> 2. Oracle documentation is the WORST on
