Whenever I do a defprotocol in the clojurescript repl, even a trivial one
like
(defprotocol IFoo
(foo [this]))
it fails with an error `Can't change/establish root binding of:
*unchecked-if* with set at line 1 '.
Everything else seems to work as expected.
When compiled outside the repl, such
Whenever I do a defprotocol in the clojurescript repl, even a trivial one
like
(defprotocol IFoo
(foo [this]))
it fails with an error `Can't change/establish root binding of:
*unchecked-if* with set at line 1 '.
Everything else seems to work as expected.
When compiled outside the repl, such
ook at it and see if you think it is correct.
>
> Andy
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, CGAT >wrote:
>
>> My understanding of == is that it is intended to establish numerical
>> equivalence
>> across types. But I think that basic contract
My understanding of == is that it is intended to establish numerical
equivalence
across types. But I think that basic contract fails with BigDecimal. For
instance,
(== 1M 1.0M) ; => false
because the scale properties of these numbers are different. So then of
course:
[(== 1 1N 1.0)
his seems
to have to do with some deep class loading magic. But this strikes me as a
bug in
the sense that the above should under all circumstances be a guarantee made
by map->A.
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:49:20 PM UTC-5, CGAT wrote:
>
> I've now put :aot [ns1] in the proje
?
Help!?
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:13:29 PM UTC-5, CGAT wrote:
>
> Without AOT, the classLoader's are not the same
>
> (str (.getClassLoader A))
>
> WebappClassLoader
> delegate: false
> repositories:
>
ass an-A-record)))
clojure.lang.DynamicClassLoader@3ac803e6
I'll try AOT compile next, as that DynamicClassLoader seems to suggest.
But I'm not sure what else can be done.
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:53:53 PM UTC-5, CGAT wrote:
>
> I did not AOT compile it, though I c
fix it.
>
> peace, Chris Jeris
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:13 PM, CGAT >wrote:
>
>> I have a frustrating situation and would appreciate any help.
>> The call
>>
>>(instance? A an-A-record)
>>
>> is returning false when an-A-record
I have a frustrating situation and would appreciate any help.
The call
(instance? A an-A-record)
is returning false when an-A-record is in fact an instance of A.
This is in a noir/compojure/ring server. But the problem *only* *occurs
*when run under tomcat, *not* when run under Jett
conj ...). Instead, use `into`,
> > which does the same thing but faster and with fewer characters.
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, November 3, 2012 3:27:24 PM UTC-7, CGAT wrote:
> >>
> >> It would be nice if clojure.core/conj had a unary implementation
>
It would be nice if clojure.core/conj had a unary implementation
([coll] coll)
The motivating use case is when one is conjoining sequences of
items to a collection all at once:
(apply conj coll seqable)
such as (apply conj #{1 2 3} [2 4 6 8 10]).
Currently (1.4.0), this will rais
11 matches
Mail list logo
