On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>
> Buck Golemon writes:
>
> > I take this to mean that there's no widely accepted solution.
>
> The widely-accepted solution is to leave a single process running. It
> certainly has limitations, but it's
> > Really, I just want `lein run` to be faster. Can someone explain where
> all
> > this time is spent?
> > I hear a lot of talk of compiling, but why would we re-compile things
> where
> > none of the dependencies have changed?
> >
> > On Wednesday
For me, this flag currently doesn't do anything to my startup time.
Am I doing something wrong?
In a `default` template project:
$ \time lein versionLeiningen 2.0.0 on Java 1.7.0_10 Java HotSpot(TM)
64-Bit Server VM
8.42user 0.29system 0:02.77elapsed 314%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
199728maxresident
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:51:55 AM UTC-8, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>
>
> Buck Golemon writes:
>
> > Can I use lein1 and expect the various clojure libraries and templates
> to
> > work?
>
> Not really. You could use it on your own projects if you st
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:05:19 AM UTC-8, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>
>
> Softaddicts writes:
>
> > SSD + fastest laptop in your price range ;)
> > lein2 help takes 12 seconds from start to back at command prompt...
>
> FWIW the help task is basically the worst case scenario for measuring
20, 2013 8:38:10 AM UTC-8, Michael Klishin wrote:
>
>
> 2013/2/20 Buck Golemon >
>
>> Can I use lein1 and expect the various clojure libraries and templates to
>> work?
>
>
> lein1 is no longer supported. It is a much better idea to move to lein2
> and
> us
I see that lein2 has factored out the 'interactive' command.
Can I use lein1 and expect the various clojure libraries and templates to
work?
There's been several mentions of jark in relation to speeding up lein. From
what I see, it doesn't seem battle tested. Do any of you use it on a daily
ba
