Doesn't this produce something like:
(fn []
(read-string "(println \"hello\")"))
which would return the list '(println "hello")?
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7:29:54 PM UTC-4, Rob Harrop wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a use case where I'd like to load small forms in String format from
> a database
Macro expansion time is just before compile time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
T
Oops.
A possible solution might look something like that...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
fir
(defrecord Pos [name value]
Object
(toString [this]
(str "")))
(def actions [(Pos. "IBM", -50)
(Pos. "ACCOR", -30);
(Pos. "IBM", -10);
(Pos. "APPLE", -20);
(Pos. "AIRFRANCE", -20)])
(def options [(Pos. "IBM", 55)
(Pos. "ACCOR", 40
String hashing uses the default java hashCode method which contains the
vulnerability.
user=> (= (hash "Ey") (hash "FZ"))
true
user=> (apply = (map hash ["EyEy" "FZEy" "EyFZ" "FZFZ"]))
true
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to
Saw this in a scala mailing list thread:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2Cq3CLI6H8
Should the clojure hash be fixed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Dennis Haupt wrote:
> so -> and ->> behave the same as long as my functions only take one
> parameter?
They do if you avoid inline function definitions.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Dennis Haupt wrote:
> i stumbled over two odd things
> 1) -> and ->> have the same source code. why is that?
-> and ->> are macros that have similar purposes. "->" inserts the previous form
as the first argument to the function, "->>" inserts it as the last.
> 2)
This was quite helpful for me.
http://technomancy.us/149
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Curran wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I would greatly appreciate any guidance on where to find a working and
> complete set of instructions for how to set up Emacs with swank-
> clojure. I am in Ubuntu.
>
> I hav
