I'm seeing related weirdness on a project that has no dependencies except
Clojure itself. It'll accept any Clojure from 1.0.0 up, but will default to
downloading the newest version:
> :dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure "[1.0.0,)"]]
The error I get is the same (missing org.clojure:clojure:jar:1.3
'lein deps' deletes the lib directiory whenever it runs, and this is the
expected behavior. 'lein jar' runs deps first, so that's why lib is
disappearing. This shouldn't be a problem if all of your dependencies are
specified in project.clj; deps should just repopulate a fresh lib directory.
If you
>
> In conventional imperative/procedural languages, as you pointed out,
> the algorithm used to calculate the factorial would be dependent on
> available compute resources. In order to select the appropriate
> algorithm one might select an arbitrary value (let's say 1000) and
> decide to use one a
Try this instead:
> > > (defproject example "0.1"
> > >:description "Example application via nailgun"
> > >:dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure
> > > "1.1.0"]
> > > [org.clojure/clojure-contrib
> > > "1.0-SNAPSHOT"]]
> > >:mai
Also, you need to use swap! on an atom, so you'll need to make savedColors
one. Read here: http://clojure.org/atoms
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:51 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, WoodHacker wrote:
>
>> Actually, swap! doesn't seem to work in my case.I should state
>>
confusing representation of the thing with the thing.
Integers don't have bases, bases are used when displaying them. The
reader does not convert a "2r0" to a "base-10 Integer value" because
there is no such thing.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Brendan Ribera
wrote:
Whe
Whenever you use the "2r0" format, the reader automatically converts it to
its base-10 Integer value. This transformation happens at the reader level
right now -- check out the 'matchNumber' method in LispReader.java for
details. So (as far as I can tell) this means that there is no standalone
bina
There's also "distinct":
http://richhickey.github.com/clojure/clojure.core-api.html#clojure.core/distinct
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Mark Engelberg
wrote:
> Why not just use the "set" function?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Giacecco wrote:
>
>> All,
>> Why does clojure miss lisp
You need to turn that argument into a genuine Java array like so:
(Foo/main (into-array ["yay"]))
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, TimDaly wrote:
> I searched the archives and google but cannot find an example.
> How do I call main?
>
> packge thefoo;
>
> public class Foo {
> public static voi
Should you pass in nil, the 'when' will guard against a NPE.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Martin Hauner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is an example in programming clojure (Chapter 2.6, Where is my
> for loop? on page 52)
> that I don't really get.
>
> (defn index-filter [pred coll]
> (when pred
>
This seems to be more of a Java question than a Clojure one, but I'll take a
stab at it anyway. I'm assuming you refer to
com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpServer. Per the docs,
"Management of threads can be done external to this object by providing a
Executor<../../../../../../../../../api/java/util/con
Or if you want something that is agnostic about the structure of your input
map, try this:
(defn alter-map
[in-map]
(map (partial reduce merge)
(partition
(count (keys in-map))
(apply interleave
(map (fn [p]
(map #(hash-map (first p)
You should be able to do (assoc p :x 3), you should get back #:Posn{:x
1, :y 2}
You meant that you get back #:Posn{:x 3, :y 2}, right? Sounds
reasonable to me.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Cool! I'll probably make use of this soon. Any plans to get it set up
on github for contributions?
On Feb 13, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Richard Lyman
wrote:
All,
I've switched the clj-peg library to be under the EPL.
This project adds support in Clojure for Parsing Expression
Grammars. In ad
I can't speak for Michal, but here's my take:
Developers working on and with open source languages typically like to
use licenses compatible with the main language. When I say open
source, I mean in the sense conveyed by the OSI (found here:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php). When I s
> I'm not in Germany.
I presume the concern isn't about you, but rather about the Germans
who can't consider the code as free to use. I imagine the idea is to
make the source truly open, everywhere.
> The problem is that it is an unreasonably high barrier to entry. There MUST
> be an electronic-
16 matches
Mail list logo
