I don't understand -- How am I using 'def' in a non-top-level-form?
I thought I was calling 'bar', getting the result which is a function, and
binding that function to a name 'foo', where the binding is 'def' at the
top level. Is that not what I'm doing?
I'm trying to avoid the use of unnecess
In case anyone's curious, It was a bad idea :)
It compiled and seemed to work fine until it tried to return a result and
instead evaluated (result).
There was a way to fix it where my letfn' macro dealt with the name and
body separately.
But I ended up defining functions on their own and using
letfn assumes fnspecs are all already properly shaped, like: (fn-name
[args] body)
But it is possible that a macroexpansion is needed to get them in the right
shape before letfn does its work, especially if the user found all his
fnspecs were of similar shape and used a macro to eliminate boile
How come the order of the reducing operations in the resulting diagrams
below is different?
Basically I want to call the first reducing operation after the first 1 and
then the second operation when it accepts.
This is with [org.clojars.semperos/automat "0.2.0-alpha3"]
(ns p.core
(:require [
