I use audio in much the same way. On the other hand, I hardly listen
to music. I have nothing to contribute, but would be interested in
seeing what people end up posting.
I suppose extracting the audio track from a video lecture is in most
cases a pretty good idea... (after all, if Feynman were al
> Because posting the link would make some modicum of sense…
>
> http://blog.twonegatives.com/post/2168030248/kata
>
> ^_^
Excellent blog post.
I have yet to read Dave Thomas's book, though it's very high on my list.
One note: As a fairly seasoned amateur of pretty much anything East
Asian I obj
> For those who were not around when the Common Lisp
> standard was being debated you might find this interesting:
>
> http://lisp.geek.nz/weekly-repl/
>
> Common Lisp Standardization: The good, the bad, and the ugly
> by Peter Seibel
Thanks for sharing this. Anyone whose name pulls up a profile
> I don't use OS X so I can't comment on such a consensus, but while I
> appreciate the sentiment, it's actually harmful to some degree to have
> lots of blog posts scattered around everywhere that all have slightly
> different advice, especially since that advice usually becomes
> outdated within
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Alec Battles wrote:
>> I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
>> week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I refuse to link
>> to
>
> Why?
Because of the website's close ties t
I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I refuse to link
to -- is one of the only places to write it up.
http://pr-usa.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=560484&Itemid=
Nice news to read before b
> On Dec 6, 9:16 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:00 PM, javajosh wrote:
>> > Sorry for asking here, but I think it's at least a little relevant to
>> > Clojure since I for one wouldn't be installing emacs if it wasn't for
>> > Clojure and Slime. Getting prompts about what th
> He may have some interesting points but...
>
> Anyone who makes grandiose claims and can't bother to give credit to
> the people who have helped them along the way deserves to be ignored.
My feelings exactly. His perception of himself seems self-aggrandizing as well.
Why is John Carmack the onl
> I thought his blog had some interesting points. I enjoyed reading it. Do I
> wish Mathematica was more affordable and/or open source? Yes. So what.
> That doesn't make Wolfram a lunatic or a fraud.
Do you recall me saying that?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Thought some Clojure folk might enjoy this:
>
> http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2010/11/100-years-since-principia-mathematica/
Though I don't use Clojure (I follow this list out of curiosity), I
have a hard time imagining why anything Wolfram writes is interesting,
and furthermore why any a user
Andriod is not Clojure's joker card, Clojure is Andriod's joker card.
--DragonCat
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
11 matches
Mail list logo
