Re: [ANN] proxy-plus: Faster and more usable replacement for "proxy"

2020-01-15 Thread Mike Rodriguez
Ah yes. I didn't consider that. On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 12:31:13 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > Using vars lets you iterate on the impl functions without invalidating the > proxy instances. I'm not sure if that was the reason, but that would be one > advantage. > > On Wednesday, Janu

Re: [ANN] proxy-plus: Faster and more usable replacement for "proxy"

2020-01-15 Thread Alex Miller
Using vars lets you iterate on the impl functions without invalidating the proxy instances. I'm not sure if that was the reason, but that would be one advantage. On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 10:46:36 AM UTC-6, Mike Rodriguez wrote: > > Do you have any idea about the reason that the Clojure

Re: [ANN] proxy-plus: Faster and more usable replacement for "proxy"

2020-01-15 Thread Mike Rodriguez
Do you have any idea about the reason that the Clojure implementation was done this way - when it obviously seems a bit limited and also slower than necessary? Just curious if there's some historical context. On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 11:58:17 AM UTC-5, Nathan Marz wrote: > > The speedup c