At a skim, seems like a reasonable thing to do.
On Wednesday, December 11, 2019 at 5:04:38 AM UTC-6, Dirk Wetzel wrote:
>
> Hey everyone! :)
>
> I was recently looking at the source for *get-in* to check if it would
> exit early as soon as a key was not present in the nested maps.
> The source fo
Hey everyone! :)
I was recently looking at the source for *get-in* to check if it would exit
early as soon as a key was not present in the nested maps.
The source for quick reference:
(defn get-in
"Returns the value in a nested associative structure,
where ks is a sequence of keys. Returns n
