Re: questionable result of Clojure code execution in org babel

2019-08-12 Thread Peter Hull
On Monday, 12 August 2019 18:47:48 UTC+1, Alex Miller wrote: > > You can’t wrap ns and forms into a single do like that. If you google > around you can find this issue referred to as the Gilardi scenario. OK, thanks, Alex. Is this not covered in https://technomancy.us/143 by the para that starts

Re: [ANN] test.check 0.10.0-RC1

2019-08-12 Thread Gary Fredericks
And now, due to lack of complaints, 0.10.0 proper has been released. No differences from 0.10.0-RC1. Gary Fredericks On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:42 AM Gary Fredericks wrote: > After Quite A Long Time, test.check (the property-based testing contrib > library) is in a state that I think is good eno

Re: questionable result of Clojure code execution in org babel

2019-08-12 Thread Alex Miller
You can’t wrap ns and forms into a single do like that. If you google around you can find this issue referred to as the Gilardi scenario. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com No

Re: questionable result of Clojure code execution in org babel

2019-08-12 Thread Peter Hull
On Friday, 9 August 2019 11:52:32 UTC+1, Johannes wrote: > > I posted the problem there. > Not a great response so far, I see! I had another little play and it may be possible to solve by a small change to ob-clojure.el. Basically we just wrap the forms and the ns into a single (do ...) form.