I understand it. And the approach seems promising and powerful. But the
example seems to me not too successful. And I drew your attention to this
fact in the hope of seeing a more convincing example. Thank you.
вторник, 18 июня 2019 г., 0:33:23 UTC+3 пользователь Alex Miller написал:
>
> Yes, th
Yes, the whole point of this approach is to define the interface in Java and
the implementation in Clojure.
> On Jun 17, 2019, at 5:07 PM, ru wrote:
>
> core.clj defines only names "getTimestamp" and "getName", but meaning of
> these names defined in Support.java. For example, that "getTimesta
core.clj defines only names "getTimestamp" and "getName", but meaning of
these names defined in Support.java. For example, that "getTimestamp" means
result of a new java.util.Date.
понедельник, 17 июня 2019 г., 23:35:30 UTC+3 пользователь Alex Miller
написал:
>
> No, there is a bit of Java code
No, there is a bit of Java code just to load the Clojure
code, but then it’s Clojure after that (the entity record impl).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts fro
Excuse me, please, may be this is a naive question. As I understand, we
want to call Clojure from Java when we want to use advantages of
implementation of some functionality in Clojure. But, in this example I see
implementation of the functionallity in Java. Am I right?
понедельник, 10 июня 201
