Re: [ANN] com.cognitect.aws/api-0.8.155

> On 2018–12–12, at 19:07, David Chelimsky wrote: > > com.cognitect.aws/api-0.8.155 is now available. Rock on! Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojur

[ANN] com.cognitect.aws/api-0.8.155

com.cognitect.aws/api-0.8.155 is now available. There have been a few unannounced releases, so here are all the changes since our initial public release on 2018-11-30: - Stringify query protocol body param vals before url encoding them. #25

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.10.0-RC5

On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 6:42:47 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback! I assume the spec one was a bad import statement? > Yes, exactly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.10.0-RC5

Thanks for the feedback!! On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:36 AM 'Avi Flax' via Clojure < clojure@googlegroups.com> wrote: > My test suite passes just fine. My project uses Java interop for various > things, including watching the filesystem for changes (via JNA), clipboard > IO, image processing, etc.

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.10.0-RC5

My test suite passes just fine. My project uses Java interop for various things, including watching the filesystem for changes (via JNA), clipboard IO, image processing, etc. Also some spec and core.async in there too. -- Our Mission: To build a better financial world Unless specifically

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.10.0-RC5

Thanks for the feedback! I assume the spec one was a bad import statement? > On Dec 12, 2018, at 12:44 AM, Mars0i wrote: > > I have a couple of small apps that use interop pretty heavily because the > Java library I'm using is very inheritance-based. There are no problems > running with RC5

Re: GraalVM's native-image incompatible with Clojure's eval?

In my case, substratevm itself pointed to me which class was being reflected on. Though it didn't specify which fields or methods, but I just set it to allow all methods and fields of the reported classes to be allowed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group