There’s a ticket for this at http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1965 if
you want to vote/watch/comment.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:07 AM Nils Grunwald
wrote:
> I would find this very interesting, especially for generating easily
> shareable documentation...
>
>
> Nils
>
>
> On Thursday, June
I would find this very interesting, especially for generating easily
shareable documentation...
Nils
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 8:39:12 AM UTC+2, Russell wrote:
>
> Just been trying out clojure.spec for the first time, looks really nice.
> It would be good to be able to do something like the
Hi all,
pedestal-api is a library for building APIs on the pedestal web server. It
implements the parts of HTTP that are useful for APIs and allows you to
document your handlers and middleware using idiomatic Clojure and generate
a compliant Swagger specification.
This 0.3.0 release contains i
This is awesome work, thank you to you and all the contributors.
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 07:55:09 UTC+1, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
>
> On Clojars, and GitHub at: https://github.com/http-kit/http-kit/releases
>
> This release was put together with the help of (23!) individual
> contributors.
>
> En
It's under consideration.
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:39:12 AM UTC-5, Russell wrote:
>
> Just been trying out clojure.spec for the first time, looks really nice.
> It would be good to be able to do something like the following:
>
> (clojure.spec/def
> "The name of the stage, which API Gatewa
This seems like a useful addition. Is this something that could be included
in Clojure 1.9?
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 11:39:12 PM UTC-7, Russell wrote:
>
> Just been trying out clojure.spec for the first time, looks really nice.
> It would be good to be able to do something like the followin
(ns demo.protectedfield
[:gen-class
:extends clojure.lang.ARef
:exposes {validator {:get getvalidator :set setvalidator}}])
Is this what you are looking for?
After compile, you will get a class that extends clojure.lang.ARef
(compile 'demo.protectedfield)
(instance? clojure.lang.ARef (dem
I would also truly appreciate instrumentation of function outputs for
manual outputs. I understand the rationale for not having it as the
default, but could it perhaps be specified as an option s/instrument?
(Considering that it was present in the first alphas, I would assume that
such option s
