Hi Ashish
The "package" is indeed the full package name.
On 09-Jul-2016 11:02 AM, "Ashish Negi" wrote:
> Should not be `package` in `:import` be the actual package name of `
> RFMCPartitioner` ?
>
> see examples at https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/import
>
> like :
>
> (ns foo.bar
> (:imp
Should not be `package` in `:import` be the actual package name of `
RFMCPartitioner` ?
see examples at https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/import
like :
(ns foo.bar
(:import (java.util Date
Calendar)
(java.util.logging Logger
Le
I've looked around, but couldn't find any discussion on the topic. Is it purely
an implementation thing, or a design choice?
(Yes, I realize you can just do (range (count v)).)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, s
Hi all! I'd like to announce the public availability of a build tool we've
been using at Amperity to work with multiple Leiningen projects inside a
single repository. There have been many presentations about monorepos by
companies like Facebook and Google, but to date the tools for working with
I have a scala program in which I have implemented a secondary sort which
works perfectly. The way I have written that program is:
object rfmc {
// Custom Key and partitioner
case class RFMCKey(cId: String, R: Double, F: Double, M: Double, C: Double)
class RFMCPartitioner(part
